Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 19 December 2021 07:39 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FBF3A09DB for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 23:39:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=bDQXDiQZ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=euGvMncY
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wr4_9uPipw3U for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 23:39:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 356433A09D9 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 23:39:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C30732009EF for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 02:39:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 02:39:19 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject; s=fm1; bh=udjnyfydQql mPFhnoLse1mOAt4+QA2GkWHss6ol2wdc=; b=bDQXDiQZTkllF/TjOP5jOgzo1Sy k2sSibROIFy2frXDWpdx+fgc76ayCpD/yMlMZQhxzIdLbzn/rv3Qcb+x6jvyQ4HK vChdis9xP4JJm130KyqfabHsxGK/H2l8aJlhpNdF84ykxmE89j52Dds7CJmf0lOa xK67Y2+9vCjUK5fposJcbIzaRzgahRb5TYZY2bXI4SKLGeMF1HzNdPpirGPLsh3t lyiWzYUrLGGvTwfmefPoC2WALwq/UV/IP0lgFvwPaZwlQr17kSZoIhRoHzoxVsos 8qXa6odv2o0RvA6I+Gb/A8BRaiS/twWmHO4OWBwKDAsdFItm1dCRR9yISEQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:from:mime-version:subject:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=udjnyfydQqlmPFhnoLse1mOAt4+QA2GkWHss6ol2wdc=; b=euGvMncY nI1jLxHI8tqtDlFett3doypw+dxWm7l5t4N0bD/LWZsV2fKQub5zs2PYgEnFhgXV W3Pygma0PHmklL/vis/TICQAdPm3c4ZLwQkIzQzj2XuHc7dH4xSdLNYWQ3s0HkDb 1y4h98RROvWUmiF+h5ZPOIafOfzabPs+TygJAt7Y/8vq/e1bHmCRg0tZSiMyIH4p 3Awpcg3ULMfVmacvRE/0xRMkytSrXGlFFFxAslFd0y1Kwa1+IYa/pVLyI+NfJpLr KwymEuQFZp+SR7xxA3uLjtVsC28WM14CA17g2pVJEUE51nFxCduxY41BrbtOjRY9 2MHMPsIP+vzhtQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:puG-YfkSdahLfiamlNaZCpnN3zKlYOcTFY-azaZME2ucQE87aVMR6g> <xme:puG-YS3mZpwcaTgJu6Hsy9fczYRZcWFNyW_bMuUYIE8SLXUkYqJiv4Flj8-N3DnFs 8LrrrOzT3zTTbBatg>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:puG-YVrHeDkzzezxEzWaRDvl-g1QlghhM9QvC3AU_8u4Oubm8uUkEGpCAHxtaZblbbX37KLXWbi0lfiV7kRqvHdAWWjP2m_IpHFiVmyasYzeymsNJ6Hj9jaHN3NVrVqhQLC3wQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrleelgddutdelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfpohcuuggrthgvuchfihgvlhguucdlgeelmdenuc fjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeftvghpohhsihhtohhrhicu tegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceuohhtuceoughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihse hmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeefvdduteejvdefkeehieevuefg fefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtg homhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedunecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegu ohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:puG-YXkpYxPoEmVsXJM-kREAq6mCNzUK79p8-oYmN5g-iiuhWMRaXQ> <xmx:puG-Yd0iS759Wucmt5o3rwfKza9oHStTaAD-99sYZQisRmXi3vFyDg> <xmx:puG-YWsC89HBPORXiEmeXpbn6I7mUXqzAhy-ANQuNGZvaTIDwg76Iw> <xmx:puG-YbDOEjxCBPirG7_ywX4ZbTJQewIBSRDKoULEV5L8g4xm_bEt9A>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 02:39:18 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============2686225331209336003=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Message-Id: <20211219073922.356433A09D9@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 23:39:22 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/dW27rAe2rZo3JFtez5Stsw832Qg>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 07:39:29 -0000
Events without label "editorial" Issues ------ * quicwg/ops-drafts (+0/-10/💬29) 15 issues received 29 new comments: - #427 Referecne to fast resumption mechanism (5 by britram, mirjak, zaheduzzaman) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/427 - #422 How does conection migration impacts the per-flow basis flow treatment? (2 by mirjak, zaheduzzaman) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/422 - #421 Non-adaptive application faking as QUIC flow to avoid UDP traffic blocking or filtering or throtlling. (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/421 - #420 right ref to amplification attack description? (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/420 - #419 lower timeout experienced by QUIC endpoints (2 by britram, ianswett) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/419 - #416 Clarificaton on any transport- and application-layer delay in RTT measurements (2 by mirjak, zaheduzzaman) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/416 - #415 something for appllicablity draft instead? (2 by mirjak, zaheduzzaman) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/415 - #411 RFC9000 has better figure than what we have here (3 by britram, mirjak, zaheduzzaman) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/411 - #410 Clarification on troubleshooting and in-network modification is needed in the introduction (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/410 - #409 Clarify control signal is QUIC protocol control signal (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/409 - #408 Interpretation of recommendations need clarification in abstract and/or Introduction (2 by mirjak, zaheduzzaman) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/408 - #407 Normative references in Applicablity document (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/407 - #406 Clarification on allowed ecvryption schemes (3 by mirjak, zaheduzzaman) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/406 - #405 Flow control ref to RFC9000 (2 by mirjak, zaheduzzaman) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/405 - #399 Caution that there are other protocols that amplify in packets and bytes (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/399 10 issues closed: - something for appllicablity draft instead? https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/415 - RFC9000 has better figure than what we have here https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/411 - Clarification on application binding external state to the connection https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/404 - Referecne to fast resumption mechanism https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/427 - What does padding do to the observablity or manageblity? https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/412 - right ref to amplification attack description? https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/420 [has PR] - Clarification on troubleshooting and in-network modification is needed in the introduction https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/410 - Clarify control signal is QUIC protocol control signal https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/409 - duplicate reference entries in the manageablity draft https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/423 - Update references to QUIC RFCs https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/397 * quicwg/load-balancers (+2/-2/💬3) 2 issues created: - QUIC-LB assumes servers don't migrate (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/149 - Discuss about the linkability issue when using Plaintext CID algorithm. (by Lingtaonju) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/148 2 issues received 3 new comments: - #149 QUIC-LB assumes servers don't migrate (1 by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/149 - #148 Discuss about the linkability issue when using Plaintext CID algorithm. (2 by Lingtaonju, martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/148 2 issues closed: - Discuss about the linkability issue when using Plaintext CID algorithm. https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/148 - QUIC-LB assumes servers don't migrate https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/149 Pull requests ------------- * quicwg/ops-drafts (+14/-18/💬3) 14 pull requests submitted: - Add DNS example, fixes #413 (by britram) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/442 - reorder text around handshake figure, addresses #411 (by britram) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/441 - use 0-RTT session resumption (instead of fast resumption) (by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/440 - use end-of-flow (by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/439 - unbreak the build on the QUIC reference (by britram) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/438 - remove confusing elaboration. fix #404. (by britram) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/437 - change ref on application to sec 8 (path validation) (by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/436 - ref 3168 (by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/435 - clarify ACK-only (by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/434 - clarification on padding (by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/433 - ref to RFC9065 and clarification about troubleshooting (by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/432 - transport layer control signaling (by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/431 - Update refs in manageability (by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/430 - change ref to rfc9000 (by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/429 3 pull requests received 3 new comments: - #442 Add DNS example, fixes #413 (1 by zaheduzzaman) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/442 - #430 Update refs in manageability (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/430 - #429 change ref to rfc9000 (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/429 18 pull requests merged: - reorder text around handshake figure, addresses #411 https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/441 - remove confusing elaboration. fix #404. https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/437 - use 0-RTT session resumption (instead of fast resumption) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/440 - use end-of-flow https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/439 - unbreak the build on the QUIC reference https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/438 - clarification on padding https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/433 - change ref on application to sec 8 (path validation) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/436 - ref 3168 https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/435 - clarify ACK-only https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/434 - ref to RFC9065 and clarification about troubleshooting https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/432 - transport layer control signaling https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/431 - Update refs in manageability https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/430 - change ref to rfc9000 https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/429 - Update draft-ietf-quic-manageability.md https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/426 - Update draft-ietf-quic-manageability.md https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/425 - Update draft-ietf-quic-applicability.md https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/403 - Use of encrypted message for Version negotiation https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/424 - Update Acknowledgment Efficiency https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/400 [ready-to-merge] * quicwg/datagram (+1/-1/💬0) 1 pull requests submitted: - Clarify fingerprinting security consideration (by tfpauly) https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/74 1 pull requests merged: - Clarify fingerprinting security consideration https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/74 * quicwg/load-balancers (+2/-1/💬2) 2 pull requests submitted: - Considerations for stateless LBs (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/151 - Sni (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/150 2 pull requests received 2 new comments: - #146 4-pass short CID algorithm (1 by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/146 - #144 refactor the description of stream cipher (1 by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/144 1 pull requests merged: - 4-pass short CID algorithm https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/146 Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts * https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts * https://github.com/quicwg/datagram * https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers * https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation * https://github.com/quicwg/quic-bit-grease * https://github.com/quicwg/qlog
- Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot