Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 19 December 2021 07:39 UTC

Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============2686225331209336003=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Message-Id: <20211219073922.356433A09D9@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 23:39:22 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/dW27rAe2rZo3JFtez5Stsw832Qg>
Precedence: list



Events without label "editorial"

Issues
------
* quicwg/ops-drafts (+0/-10/💬29)
  15 issues received 29 new comments:
  - #427 Referecne to fast resumption mechanism (5 by britram, mirjak, zaheduzzaman)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/427 
  - #422 How does conection migration impacts the per-flow basis flow treatment? (2 by mirjak, zaheduzzaman)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/422 
  - #421 Non-adaptive application faking as QUIC flow to avoid UDP traffic blocking or filtering or throtlling. (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/421 
  - #420 right ref to amplification attack description? (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/420 
  - #419 lower timeout experienced by QUIC endpoints (2 by britram, ianswett)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/419 
  - #416 Clarificaton on any transport- and application-layer delay in RTT measurements (2 by mirjak, zaheduzzaman)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/416 
  - #415 something for appllicablity draft instead? (2 by mirjak, zaheduzzaman)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/415 
  - #411 RFC9000 has better figure than what we have here (3 by britram, mirjak, zaheduzzaman)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/411 
  - #410 Clarification on troubleshooting and in-network modification is needed in the introduction (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/410 
  - #409 Clarify control signal is QUIC protocol control signal (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/409 
  - #408 Interpretation of recommendations need clarification in abstract and/or Introduction (2 by mirjak, zaheduzzaman)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/408 
  - #407 Normative references in Applicablity document (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/407 
  - #406 Clarification on allowed ecvryption schemes (3 by mirjak, zaheduzzaman)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/406 
  - #405 Flow control ref to RFC9000 (2 by mirjak, zaheduzzaman)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/405 
  - #399 Caution that there are other protocols that amplify in packets and bytes (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/399 

  10 issues closed:
  - something for appllicablity draft instead? https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/415 
  - RFC9000 has better figure than what we have here https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/411 
  - Clarification on application binding external state to the connection https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/404 
  - Referecne to fast resumption mechanism https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/427 
  - What does padding do to the observablity or manageblity? https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/412 
  - right ref to amplification attack description? https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/420 [has PR] 
  - Clarification on troubleshooting and in-network modification is needed in the introduction https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/410 
  - Clarify control signal is QUIC protocol control signal https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/409 
  - duplicate reference entries in the manageablity draft https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/423 
  - Update references to QUIC RFCs https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/397 

* quicwg/load-balancers (+2/-2/💬3)
  2 issues created:
  - QUIC-LB assumes servers don't migrate (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/149 
  - Discuss about the linkability issue when using Plaintext CID algorithm. (by Lingtaonju)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/148 

  2 issues received 3 new comments:
  - #149 QUIC-LB assumes servers don't migrate (1 by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/149 
  - #148 Discuss about the linkability issue when using Plaintext CID algorithm. (2 by Lingtaonju, martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/148 

  2 issues closed:
  - Discuss about the linkability issue when using Plaintext CID algorithm. https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/148 
  - QUIC-LB assumes servers don't migrate https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/149 



Pull requests
-------------
* quicwg/ops-drafts (+14/-18/💬3)
  14 pull requests submitted:
  - Add DNS example, fixes #413 (by britram)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/442 
  - reorder text around handshake figure, addresses #411 (by britram)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/441 
  - use 0-RTT session resumption (instead of fast resumption) (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/440 
  - use end-of-flow (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/439 
  - unbreak the build on the QUIC reference (by britram)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/438 
  - remove confusing elaboration. fix #404. (by britram)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/437 
  - change ref on application to sec 8 (path validation) (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/436 
  - ref 3168 (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/435 
  - clarify ACK-only (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/434 
  - clarification on padding (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/433 
  - ref to RFC9065 and clarification about troubleshooting (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/432 
  - transport layer control signaling (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/431 
  - Update refs in manageability (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/430 
  - change ref to rfc9000 (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/429 

  3 pull requests received 3 new comments:
  - #442 Add DNS example, fixes #413 (1 by zaheduzzaman)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/442 
  - #430 Update refs in manageability (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/430 
  - #429 change ref to rfc9000 (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/429 

  18 pull requests merged:
  - reorder text around handshake figure, addresses #411
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/441 
  - remove confusing elaboration. fix #404.
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/437 
  - use 0-RTT session resumption (instead of fast resumption)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/440 
  - use end-of-flow
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/439 
  - unbreak the build on the QUIC reference
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/438 
  - clarification on padding
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/433 
  - change ref on application to sec 8 (path validation)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/436 
  - ref 3168
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/435 
  - clarify ACK-only
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/434 
  - ref to RFC9065 and clarification about troubleshooting
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/432 
  - transport layer control signaling
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/431 
  - Update refs in manageability
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/430 
  - change ref to rfc9000
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/429 
  - Update draft-ietf-quic-manageability.md
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/426 
  - Update draft-ietf-quic-manageability.md
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/425 
  - Update draft-ietf-quic-applicability.md
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/403 
  - Use of encrypted message for Version negotiation
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/424 
  - Update Acknowledgment Efficiency
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/400 [ready-to-merge] 

* quicwg/datagram (+1/-1/💬0)
  1 pull requests submitted:
  - Clarify fingerprinting security consideration (by tfpauly)
    https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/74 

  1 pull requests merged:
  - Clarify fingerprinting security consideration
    https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/74 

* quicwg/load-balancers (+2/-1/💬2)
  2 pull requests submitted:
  - Considerations for stateless LBs (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/151 
  - Sni (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/150 

  2 pull requests received 2 new comments:
  - #146 4-pass short CID algorithm (1 by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/146 
  - #144 refactor the description of stream cipher (1 by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/144 

  1 pull requests merged:
  - 4-pass short CID algorithm
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/146 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/datagram
* https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers
* https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation
* https://github.com/quicwg/quic-bit-grease
* https://github.com/quicwg/qlog

Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot