[Technical Errata Reported] RFC9002 (7539)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 07 June 2023 13:19 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA2AC1595FD for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 06:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MwXpy8hd9BB1 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 06:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18ACAC140675 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 06:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id E0E657FDE1; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 06:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
To: jri.ietf@gmail.com, ianswett@google.com, martin.h.duke@gmail.com, Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com, matt.joras@gmail.com, lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com
Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9002 (7539)
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: pluknet@nginx.com, quic@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20230607131951.E0E657FDE1@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2023 06:19:51 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/du9R4zhzoa1dOZ-or3ZHOgvxLWA>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2023 13:19:56 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9002, "QUIC Loss Detection and Congestion Control". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7539 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@nginx.com> Section: 5.3 Original Text ------------- smoothed_rtt = 7/8 * smoothed_rtt + 1/8 * adjusted_rtt rttvar_sample = abs(smoothed_rtt - adjusted_rtt) rttvar = 3/4 * rttvar + 1/4 * rttvar_sample Corrected Text -------------- rttvar_sample = abs(smoothed_rtt - adjusted_rtt) rttvar = 3/4 * rttvar + 1/4 * rttvar_sample smoothed_rtt = 7/8 * smoothed_rtt + 1/8 * adjusted_rtt Notes ----- Per Appendix A.7 of this RFC and Section 2 of the referred RFC 6298, rttvar should be computed before updating smoothed_rtt itself. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC9002 (draft-ietf-quic-recovery-34) -------------------------------------- Title : QUIC Loss Detection and Congestion Control Publication Date : May 2021 Author(s) : J. Iyengar, Ed., I. Swett, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : QUIC Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9002 (7539) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9002 (7539) Kazuho Oku
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9002 (7539) Zaheduzzaman Sarker
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9002 (7539) Christian Huitema
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9002 (7539) Ian Swett