IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: too much call to SetLossDetectionTimer()?

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Fri, 11 September 2020 12:27 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784AE3A0FAA for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 05:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E6Ir47f_AaTj for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 05:27:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 569923A0FA8 for <quic@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 05:27:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:489d:6349:5a22:74f0] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:489d:6349:5a22:74f0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D89770160D; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:27:32 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1599827252; bh=KD5tzl1OekQzC1Y5lqn3R8XjmMDoSwNsISR0fNy5GuY=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=vqUcgYwwdY6IRZZwBn5ZN8mKYLh1l7QyboIKeKyjRCGgS54gHZh7GxrJMcDXGLHj6 W+XakjTKGon3en9VJjL4/elwDgen98Lg25n6ij/gyPn75cIpBv/RI2Aw/TNKZIpgG/ VbIIxGDuD5ayGzZCLmymOKn2HGSyvZzpdhtMu90M=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <A65FDCC7-4708-4838-85CC-375E7CF13F5D@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_331855E8-BA76-47BD-A050-DE8822234929"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Subject: Re: too much call to SetLossDetectionTimer()?
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:27:30 +0300
In-Reply-To: <CADf7dJgN+pAZC=2pBm=A7LExMYqgtMEd2zrjtdg3mCD4c1zDYA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Ian Swett <ianswett=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
To: newbie quic <quicnewbie@gmail.com>
References: <CADf7dJgAi4dcRDUZgEm5S8tXHBJ-95LxZx-=wrUbrHP1VdhWbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKcm_gPBXtDhSyw3N80YJTAEwRs4f-8wfnEFfZRjVWcUjXuvjQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACpbDce+0QLWFTM3_V2f1ERPfzuk1Ysk9a=UMUQ+A-ppAKjY4A@mail.gmail.com> <CADf7dJgN+pAZC=2pBm=A7LExMYqgtMEd2zrjtdg3mCD4c1zDYA@mail.gmail.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 6D89770160D.A47EC
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/es4iCIZkRaTHER48f80L-noRnT4>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:27:46 -0000

Hi "newbie quic",

anonymous IETF participation isn't really possible. Please see https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md and referenced documents.

Thanks,
Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email