Getting to a First Implementation Draft

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 11 May 2017 04:54 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2091E12EAFB for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 May 2017 21:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.703
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.703 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HIcG3z-fHtR7 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 May 2017 21:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95D85126BF6 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 May 2017 21:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.18] (unknown [124.189.96.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87B0722E1FA; Thu, 11 May 2017 00:53:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Getting to a First Implementation Draft
Message-Id: <20DB6018-3E7B-454F-8BEC-0F839D949AFE@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 14:53:48 +1000
Cc: Lars Eggert <lars@netapp.com>
To: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/h8wqzyoR8hiyst0wWzn3l7y9F8c>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 04:54:14 -0000

Previously, we've mentioned an intention to have a First Implementation Draft -- that is, an Internet-Draft that we feel is suitable for implementers to write code to, for the purposes of interoperability testing and gathering feedback -- shortly after the Paris interim.

Due to the size and complexity of HTTP-over-QUIC, implementing all four drafts for this purpose on a reasonable timeline isn't workable.

Instead, the editors have identified a subset of functionality that they believe will serve as a suitable starting point. See:
  https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/wiki/First-Implementation-Draft

They've also identified the set of issues that we believe will be necessary to have proposals for before Paris; see:
  https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/milestone/1

If all goes well, the plan is to have a set of drafts out (very) soon that do so; then, we can discuss them and the First Implementation Draft Candidate in the lead-up to and during the Paris interim.

After Paris, we'll make any necessary adjustments to the documents and publish another set, which will be the First Implementation Draft.

Please comment / raise concerns / make suggestions on-list. 

Regards,

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/