IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Server's Preferred Address

Rui Paulo <rpaulo@apple.com> Fri, 27 April 2018 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <rpaulo@apple.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA7012711D for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sz5nAInpoMb1 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-in7.apple.com (mail-out7.apple.com [17.151.62.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40831126D3F for <quic@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=apple.com; s=mailout2048s; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@apple.com; t=1524850680; x=2388764280; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-id:To:Cc:MIME-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-reply-to:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=xpDgy6ekuWlja0IwRf6yWeHeP/hTVmF9RgJx2zed03c=; b=z/ccK/NQFmS8cq+ktORmD7N3zI+3hMv/VjM6Eud/tACUgXic0VIi5EHzoJQZEz0e zCIgLjDEUA9wOJ6h3K8tqChA9SzwLJNCXtjD3ODb/2UTxmEOgiizfM7L9OMgquc4 t1/cDLWS27lv16gNS3OMm95mRLyPhomKCjzweHpI2VBrlb4nwXDQmtvWNJphCdCe mBpK5ohm4Ub87hcPOLUfQJ7ostvW4CaZTNWoDaSG+eHvTPBWRrsQp1qjyonfePox bhcg4r/m6WhnzMjRMiDzOJzN+RXtGblAIqTIfgIye/rtfBrxYUaqX3Fkqg5O/gZX Vp7hKL+BHAa7s3vE7O8UXQ==;
Received: from relay6.apple.com (relay6.apple.com [17.128.113.90]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail-in7.apple.com (Apple Secure Mail Relay) with SMTP id 7C.AA.04908.8FF53EA5; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 11973e16-446529e00000132c-a1-5ae35ff8e929
Received: from nwk-mmpp-sz09.apple.com (nwk-mmpp-sz09.apple.com [17.128.115.80]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay6.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 7D.4E.23861.8FF53EA5; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Received: from [17.234.117.50] (unknown [17.234.117.50]) by nwk-mmpp-sz09.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.2.2.20180403 64bit (built Apr 3 2018)) with ESMTPSA id <0P7U00LT2UBCLY20@nwk-mmpp-sz09.apple.com>; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: rpaulo@apple.com
Subject: Re: Server's Preferred Address
From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <CAO8oSXmbTcGw+eo+Bf8kSfCtU2JN+=4nThLk4N7L7MdLf6V-qg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:37:59 -0700
Cc: ianswett=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org, quic@ietf.org, mbishop@evequefou.be
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <1561491C-0E30-4FB2-98D6-CE5480211D2E@apple.com>
References: <SN1PR08MB185489DC70881C810110B987DABB0@SN1PR08MB1854.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <CAKcm_gOxWR3Eo4=TAhJaeEy9RcoGAHcRuLRM5m26mt4bFCW_jQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAO8oSXmbTcGw+eo+Bf8kSfCtU2JN+=4nThLk4N7L7MdLf6V-qg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Wood <christopherwood07@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrLLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FAYpfsj/nGUwZmbhhbTv19js3j48yuj xa/nXewWPQu4HVg8Tiy7wupx/vgGVo+ds+6yeyxZ8pMpgCWKyyYlNSezLLVI3y6BK6NzwWTG gvnMFZ96njA3MB5l6mLk5JAQMJGY/2UpSxcjF4eQwGomidd7NrLAJD5NeMgMYgsJrGeSuHWH FcTmFRCU+DH5HlANBwezgLrElCm5EL0TmSSmrW9mA6kRFpCQ2H/yITuErS6xdPs0sDlsAkoS z/pOgMU5BYIlbnzrYwKZwyKgKvHgtT9ImFnAV2LSz0NMELa2xJN3F6DW2kjM+/gN6s43jBJr f78AS4gIGEnsfHyKHeJmJYn/u44wgxRJCMxhk7g4+TTLBEbhWUjunoVw9ywkOxYwMq9iFMpN zMzRzcwz10ssKMhJ1UvOz93ECAr/6XZiOxgfrrI6xCjAwajEw8vg+ThKiDWxrLgy9xCjNAeL kjjvGrZHUUIC6YklqdmpqQWpRfFFpTmpxYcYmTg4pRoYmWL+J+fVzRM56nv0kcaalUFCk5ny ln9NFezcMbNfOFvy9VbdiUqZ/vc29Z66a9I7z9BLPmDO3s9Mvuw7rB90fVs+U/agwv+NvroK SyYHJeU/9LxjmxRupMMktEXhlu0X6x91L6+IlgrVnvX6eOZZ/owJR5b3czUWvPz0c6OsQ8OH KO35ttt/K7EUZyQaajEXFScCALaP6BpgAgAA
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrALMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FAcoPsj/nGUwbf5ehbTv19js3j48yuj xa/nXewWPQu4HVg8Tiy7wupx/vgGVo+ds+6yeyxZ8pMpgCWKyyYlNSezLLVI3y6BK6NzwWTG gvnMFZ96njA3MB5l6mLk5JAQMJH4NOEhM4gtJLCeSeLWHVYQm1dAUOLH5HssXYwcHMwC6hJT puR2MXIBlUxkkpi2vpkNpEZYQEJi/8mH7BC2usTS7dPA5rAJKEk86zsBFucUCJa48a2PCWQO i4CqxIPX/iBhZgFfiUk/DzFB2NoST95dgFprIzHv4zcWiF1vGCXW/n4BlhARMJLY+fgUO8TN ShL/dx1hnsAoMAvJqbMQTp2FZOwCRuZVjAJFqTmJlWZ6iQUFOal6yfm5mxjB4VoYtYOxYbnV IUYBDkYlHl4Gz8dRQqyJZcWVuYcYJTiYlUR4d9x+GCXEm5JYWZValB9fVJqTWnyIUZqDRUmc d60FULVAemJJanZqakFqEUyWiYNTqoFxkvpZNaO1J6ayue6u4HHzaRE/L6n4gyfqY7jwltbi 58/7mj8/2v32gQ/3moQPFb8y725fH3Xwpdu7ew8Y9tg/M6zn2VnLXXHAceL3uNb3C59vSzpw VuRRMa/UuhfBjB/WvZb6rWO7rJW9OU799pQzm6sPHTxRw2H7rnGt1P4nMVoZxzVspTdXKLEU ZyQaajEXFScCALgP3PVTAgAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/oIyufBwYQqf79HhweGOLj-e-JfM>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 17:38:03 -0000

On Apr 27, 2018, at 10:09, Christopher Wood <christopherwood07@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> I think this is a compelling change, at least for supporting migration in
> the presence of anycast, and especially if the newly probed path properties
> are superior to the one on which the handshake was performed.

I also support this change and the PR looks good to me.

—
Rui Paulo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email