IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Reserved bit in draft-ietf-quic-transport-11 short header

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 25 April 2018 07:22 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CD3126579 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:22:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=TEm8Yd6S; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=FaEpfqRc
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gdmfioj7vsp6 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2432D127077 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B462218FD; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 03:22:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 25 Apr 2018 03:22:47 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=wNp6Vz97BwYoZGJ3eIIL8radAHLZT ghjDthZwjJKHR4=; b=TEm8Yd6SE7JDWGBgmr0mYQ5TBnzjo4TcRRnDen13k0YMy gqm9yzVxQXO+SaGDSXXFiyHqSO66+BFeGZT4/Sj/U1JPSFle3JX5CK9UZ4cFlgdZ zmLd3Ao1eWrwC7JbJIDkmitjG5hVt0qsBJgpopQ/9ZgT51UtnuedOcN0kQZT1RtV pglkMIZQ/q70aa7r3AqCwrWPMbLPBqiUmThfId64dnoqBqOiOZbulhw5CaXz7FrD buEr0ewZOlqrr7I6XaiJvQD6ItFLfQ2nhgdrFZq4wV9FLjJIlDiDQre2pF5D00Fk bJO2Egi1Wx7MdSPIoVI6QTca6MeyBaFnFP/okpJng==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=wNp6Vz 97BwYoZGJ3eIIL8radAHLZTghjDthZwjJKHR4=; b=FaEpfqRcjYnvBBU91CSv4Q w1vZF7P3PxYdpHFaJP0p2OSQXH51ryGPLGN7y+SD99gKwq4ICawIFYSMTgAllR37 lSn+x94C5xFQ3g0XvMB55L7uGz1qTQ/ZL0j9Tmc1glPKyuVjjqRKgPwXGRLxKwgg /R5XDqlcYMUiPtvhtU16jEq2xvcpipDQvK19f7fqwJlpqn97jXkbLpFtP6Lk/Ttp XTYtWXaADjhGUeriOKQn/8FQLSRyHkYBM22I8CRrss3zflKEhyJhKY9PLS25UdTo yVOrGNKel0Mo/0YTCD5lNjoIiMX+2eiMTfuA1OA6pO8CgZ06NviWGSUmBLmsDbEg ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:xyzgWsBje4HxYOWOH-TgVBpvl2jkxndNpijBVUJ9aUre-tqbEXXUsg>
Received: from [10.188.210.187] (100.1.71.37.rev.sfr.net [37.71.1.100]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 901601025E; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 03:22:46 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Subject: Re: Reserved bit in draft-ietf-quic-transport-11 short header
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD877D4D@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:22:45 +0200
Cc: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <250D61A2-96D0-461D-93F7-F8306BDD88C1@mnot.net>
References: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD877D4D@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
To: "Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/oupwce_cuYJuM2AhUOL1vFWj3dQ>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 07:22:51 -0000

Roni,

The discussion in the room and the followup e-mail here made the distinction that these bits were for experimentation, not that they were specifically for the spin bit; that means that the current drafts don't need to incorporate any text specific to the spin bit, yet.

This isn't intended to be outlast our closed interop testing, so a signal isn't necessary.

Cheers,



> On 25 Apr 2018, at 7:18 am, Roni Even (A) <roni.even@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> I was surprised that there is no mention of the spin bit in the text “Reserved:  The sixth bit (0x4) of octet 0 is reserved for experimentation.” And expected to see a  reference to the spin-exp draft.
>  
> According to the meeting notes the hum was for option “b”  “Reserve bits, separate doc (soon) that may be incorporated in later consensus “ . The bit was reserved for spin bit which was the topic of the discussion and the hum and not for general experimentation.
> At the meeting there were no suggestion for general experimentations and it will not work if this bit may be used for other experiments without any specific way to signal what experiment is running now. 
>  
> Roni Even

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email