IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numbering

Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com> Mon, 09 April 2018 08:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mikkelfj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDC1127601 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 01:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VbLdWm5kUFju for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 01:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x229.google.com (mail-it0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13782126C19 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 01:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x229.google.com with SMTP id v194-v6so9225184itb.0 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 01:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=d68NKZ0ikWb70xY+7TAbHuuq+SUvqmR/jI22rnnlJdA=; b=rFFsWT8nwPC1+g0LFyj6b/8hl3N5IEAgFI8lpOlz7Thcei+HPpHB/selFU/WuNqt9e vdg/5vsE19m/Vjg69mlBQ7fBG40o/P+rjcQ5dU57BuERB1LA2B3sXPHwZkHdtJ86bHBt Zhf5uG4p5Bk5aiESMnjyOAy2M4AkpwmhWlkuBBGrQTSo/C05eI1xNLn9gcvUr/Do7EeN 4ndGOGZq0H0BZjU1YseBlekoQzKvs0ZNweMzizQIGwVKhDMc1AoYNiN+nYnzteRl31jZ n170D1R3zyn3bbblshiSkxMNl0U4+vyUzLVs3hkb3gW1g8o8c5LOckIE+6lShiPP0UOq t1UA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=d68NKZ0ikWb70xY+7TAbHuuq+SUvqmR/jI22rnnlJdA=; b=pA33f8SgA+jeGGx8dEohHT4JX/w/QVJvLVa3XlJLJheHX3dQCiaOTgt16CIYhpsVID oUioOFYtbM9ypw14RXfkDJFn/+lZhEu/BOR5PDp4efZQE4Vtk901xdZIWRAPPju61yda ZhW+7NmYpy7pzg+VIgbvhxGAnq7EX1iE6UjTrcRiKZcWoOObhzPNlMi7rDhjn0cj+zFs +0u805vI4NPD2cX4KmODZleyZohTRX9TuZSeZ70C6vA54weUtFT4eKjYjL3aXHz5gqL9 DUuzgUCEHmK81ur9amb8kbKwFBgR5+dwB6JvdNaeKc+WBZ7VVlrb+iLzCCxh8oeunv59 6kSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDXHtczZ1rZ+nERb0dMoUinIJrW8CPZje6HR+a5ihFfvc4pi/aS OQuahrkMADFn4WR7sqWtJQSqeGZ8LR9uPHNCm0U=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48CQAcoimRtDc+58IBTrIMxfm1NudDl4kS5Xq72LVsv01fzhlvyc7m5VnxYSqyG9+L/oznZHHmHc+grJXlcA3Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:5085:: with SMTP id m127-v6mr4191343itb.118.1523262671800; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 01:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 04:31:11 -0400
From: Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7CF7F94CB496BF4FAB1676F375F9666A3BB22349@bgb01xud1012>
References: <20180408200158.kuekyw4nk8ks4kkw@webmail.eurecom.fr> <CABkgnnXWcshxAE8F7+TuMNG+zSD620ZLwk=b1a=QdkSfQ+20AQ@mail.gmail.com> <0c2bbb1f-af3c-e196-3605-db9458936a42@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <20180409090233.hxlqgu1wqo0o04c0@webmail.eurecom.fr> <CABkgnnWha2_dHpo=Lj=4dMmDbLHjfqN4eMyiMBKfM5bMeVtf6w@mail.gmail.com> <7CF7F94CB496BF4FAB1676F375F9666A3BB22349@bgb01xud1012>
X-Mailer: Airmail (420)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 04:31:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CAN1APdemJR5Ut42Ars+L0RQAEeSszQS0=1-dJ7pqsw6+WjDxZw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numbering
To: Lucas Pardue <lucas.pardue@bbc.co.uk>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Ariel Otilibili Anieli <otilibil@eurecom.fr>
Cc: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000073d8560569663ab2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/uyLw_kNErNYHaRo1YhPkghIXI8k>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 08:31:15 -0000

http://fortune.com/2018/02/23/kfc-chicken-shortage-apology/

I guess the equivalent would be to write ICUQ when running out of UDP
packets.

Mikkel

On 9 April 2018 at 10.26.22, Lucas Pardue (lucas.pardue@bbc.co.uk) wrote:

In day to day talk I tell people that QUIC is the KFC of transport
protocols, and has similar levels of GREASE.

Lucas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email