Re: Connection IDs

Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> Thu, 08 March 2018 18:25 UTC

Return-Path: <ianswett@google.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF1B12711D for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:25:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.71
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.71 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZaOoQ2N4UAdc for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:25:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x234.google.com (mail-io0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D35E12706D for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:25:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x234.google.com with SMTP id u84so681780iod.9 for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 10:25:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VW9ZkDeRCrxfOkxQrb157m+uf1JwzrvAMKut4vrCfm8=; b=neYWEQmWZJP2I79iQrBYACRI6A+KzeFBK7S5Uhy5vb94/TI3AenNx4BOjB+Mm9dxht 9Ch3CxdtUo3FxKnesbJf20qMZ0O07HNa7ibzYAYEHYmFdw6wxK9DyRNtmMx3Cy7BE2ei O/9CTK73YBTbTFC1X8tOI7QM0KcaBSm1SKVE1V7ARpzZUB7rbxMM8glHF7rpt6VIEGxO 2NSRofPAdTnFGTkS8L5Om42qFkIumWJK9XBGXBxGljX6SK70TCCnFj+A82SjUuC1aP/I 75ZeDIypmRPq6G7/wbkPYF68sY6Xm/b5vKjtBWGkiqhfZBmI08BsIiCa1xxuv2UZGj6Q eMWA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VW9ZkDeRCrxfOkxQrb157m+uf1JwzrvAMKut4vrCfm8=; b=T6bBL7lQmSS2y88bbm4nMu6P2JU8iHi6AR3B/z71weI/Pyds58ZmiX4LBKbHFZyMDV E6lkUR/xhq4/WXuaD0jXGMQDB9pjBNZjasAZeRjCX0sm6HsUkCF7aJ5QvM8EkU35TkoR LxrnuKD8OwULvw5VVWAj3LkHuzysP9zn6tOUnrfA6/070pMCUF0hQ853ir87eQ+SP69C 5B/bquxep1P3sP40emgJpvGB+eTFca+Kuoeqpev2lhaGwr8N1pxyV7al5s76VoP/kulY Ynd7SzR9nlMNRuuzi2wM5k8x3mgqdooi6olRx4hAFEHOaA6RdMSuHiz8bIQa6RQ95zwO WQBg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7HfnYcnJMhIBy2aYrDZ/dOM+kaRHABEud96IUl8d51LewHxQT/d ZVHqPX2Y3IATHigCcKH7u+4XtD1FgLoOe91X4eNe/w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvCTd+giDUDWtt84Z/OoRrh4s6D5w5q8AyPQudhjTVy6MYIbK6ExMuwt9PSE9Y5ZQlVNwLnNr3VLYb53K/IhNQ=
X-Received: by 10.107.129.224 with SMTP id l93mr32485035ioi.140.1520533510387; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 10:25:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABkgnnVSCnmzjWOZwQM+ctTxFXVzsVYe6Q3Zzk4yj3LNTYUtHw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOdDvNo9qmZqmEXBGM4bM6q3EO1FGuUxLSSWsVhNEYsn5u9puQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKcm_gMR070JUegQbDw--RNr+0XYiBMwaTM3MBmqUo21u922TQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACpbDccpuNWnX=Y+gKaPxLEjUOnvu+hr9FqH+R6ZspwOfUq-qg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUPJYG-QE4qxfOd-6AoHHgxVq4K=EyRfoxkcvdDF=oaZA@mail.gmail.com> <2894BA64-BB3C-446C-91D2-6BF4A042AB44@apple.com> <CAN1APdf=+6HzfTXAjiaY1ry+6A0THB_JP+4Gc+OLQLXciVtAdg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOdDvNqXP+G-jPFJbxWDeaoKnoXck-tt6sz_n9g_EfpttvLtPQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNqXP+G-jPFJbxWDeaoKnoXck-tt6sz_n9g_EfpttvLtPQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 18:24:59 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKcm_gOf79R-DxiG5N9Pmji8aKWoEqcek0D--yj8FJzuWYVyEg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Connection IDs
To: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Mikkel_Fahn=C3=B8e_J=C3=B8rgensen?= <mikkelfj@gmail.com>, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@apple.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ed31ac232560566eacb90"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/yHisW7-Phz7bkWYP-TpiuMyL4jI>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 18:25:13 -0000

GQUIC inadvertently broke public reset(the predecessor to stateless reset)
for a period of time and it had a very visible effect on average latency,
so I would like to keep it.

More importantly, I think we should separate the conversation about
stateless reset from the this Connection ID one.  Those that want to keep
stateless reset are ok with the potential reduction in effectiveness this
change can cause and those that want to get rid of it don't care.


On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 1:17 PM Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <
> mikkelfj@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> The only thing is that I am little uneasy about Stateless Reset - is it
>> really needed?
>>
>>
> I feel the same way.. let it timeout.
>
>