Re: 2nd draft, response to Liaison Statement, "LS on ATSSS Phase 2Requirements to IETF QUIC Working Group"

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Mon, 12 October 2020 06:46 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD0C3A12B8 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 23:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z6UbG2DgJyFA for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 23:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E627F3A11E4 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 23:46:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:2d98:715f:4161:4736] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:2d98:715f:4161:4736]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB6176090F8; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 09:46:39 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1602485199; bh=cnD1bKsqiZHDzBP4hrt9VzI1sEM9L1nyO498JGsj9bM=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=j93MvmMhB2DxBk/GWLUu4xFjBcXR9kxuVHvPQ7owBL4LKn/GoJep9Z7ocKGBF8Euo XkQHbTW8gJoFEi6yiH0gQDsnrH3sXwLGZ9uAyG5tILbSEA2XLWObjmOnZlXSvbvVMj 5DrQ/qqeduVQchaLCeHLiMpnCDXmOMoPqXs7NZKg=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <E1B4B0DA-9D33-42A2-90CA-A9CDDBFFC850@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D80185BA-D825-4553-B362-CFC60CCF21BB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Subject: Re: 2nd draft, response to Liaison Statement, "LS on ATSSS Phase 2Requirements to IETF QUIC Working Group"
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 09:46:38 +0300
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR02MB517624591C278FF090E702E1F7080@BYAPR02MB5176.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
To: Waqar Zia <wzia@qti.qualcomm.com>
References: <61E60D24-856D-44FF-B133-693FC9C40229@eggert.org> <CAKKJt-fH1oSTaEw6_L6b-bdJxWP7RB2iVgeErRu4KW4zCNhZzg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPDSy+5TvW9xLbY-RJk00zi5Sd4m1uu5mE3b1wqFAsQXETYZmg@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR02MB517624591C278FF090E702E1F7080@BYAPR02MB5176.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: CB6176090F8.A4DF1
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/yZSkREbMcWyrmJyviLXR7cbwDRo>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 06:46:49 -0000

Hi,

On 2020-10-9, at 19:32, Waqar Zia <wzia@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> In the view of the recently scheduled QUIC WG Virtual Meeting on 22nd October related to this topic, what is the plan on this LS?

our response liaison statement is waiting for AD approval (as far as I can tell) before it will be posted.

Thanks,
Lars