Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 06 December 2020 07:35 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0F23A0E67 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 23:35:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=gs9BWojX; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=WFYFSMaK
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cQSPGCxKhZCp for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 23:35:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B7BA3A0E66 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 23:35:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8BC5C0134 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 02:35:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 06 Dec 2020 02:35:00 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date; s= fm1; bh=og0m1wynPXUryr5flOi1huPFI5N9nVtejzz9QdI5rf0=; b=gs9BWojX rMPFEo452IvgHFQfCEBC36aKL5pSlIlsPyHEhaYVGrSCxm8G5sQTscuitosTSYoj 6Cjkn+o5ankC4YKZUbE9YjI1TI0vPf08CG32bY2M4+YxvP6EBXxMLubChPuzVoLP BMYYBbw2Y4soFR9LajyIfjXHUKJEw9ZgWVLd1NYFw/V5Zr+SGRyo1H9wT2gSBXd1 d5ztOzxhGgGJVUdqEl4sNGyG+A+tdM+PwwqnAAWfUEUqKABkBYogigA9EwbgqIrb xT/CFvM6Zg8xhps4tY5r7t6gKtf+tOKbZa15WJRy1s13O2w0JoWh2SmP/z5Ogybn +pgN9SCi6texzw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=og0m1wynPXUryr5flOi1huPFI5N9n Vtejzz9QdI5rf0=; b=WFYFSMaKLh/87WW+uh4yfBZ7f0bIjaBX1oY6Z3PR2NR8v icNbQnWo/ADWbNdgdJNl1mhaKBckejBcoKglv/U/kiGfCxWaD0BSg+tT3P9u4xdj vE0K6FE0ta71JWJSn9bnH8LM6phx//AlywaRx2kyllyubZRPRrza0t4VLwcsxLUy cbfFkGshcvEPDVMWh5qOozP9vApRUh9EIkg26/62Sa1QhfJXyF3lbkjeOkSdA/5C TrztW2GoNMe8Ztc1HZEn1ySQqPxHueNGbWMsDDLjbs+bbh/3SsgTjy4aTGJ7bP9B YnSPLLn+leqlomCneCk7DmHCuyqAZNPM7IE7onXag==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:pInMX02Lg16ZeZP31H1xGTw8t9uWQW6Vng4vWXjcxwbUi11IKbqTfA> <xme:pInMX_GZG-aUlFJEqYZ8LyX5uXI6SbEHGDcm3rPCl1LjXasGqpnDFHYjucrn3r7RL -vNc01lPzqyRIiBlw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudejuddguddtkecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtje enucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhihucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicu uehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeugfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudei teenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecukfhppeegtddrieehrddvfedtrd dukeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedunecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegu ohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:pInMX85pm6UREOOMbDbTkmjqGKcTX1VZg6WTaCX94Mv9Ue6Pgtf1sg> <xmx:pInMX92MBpfI_IPGplOiUZK6s77v-PM4kwJ3OVe1m5BGbiQRLbI1uQ> <xmx:pInMX3FMWO6SIkYRImNZlqzlRSvQkUojhaSkV4Ugt_8y1EgTxxn9-g> <xmx:pInMX9N2nUPLfs-04EU4ixpB8tWz0nneu-8eXP0PXGcHL9XYD1zsFw>
Received: from fv-az60-565.internal.cloudapp.net (unknown [40.65.230.18]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 309D124005B for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 02:35:00 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============4397631364037734954=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Message-Id: <20201206073500.309D124005B@mailuser.nyi.internal>
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 02:35:00 -0500
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/z_xyDQCfZlJNRRK6AChgqN0mg3k>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 07:35:05 -0000
Events without label "editorial" Issues ------ * quicwg/base-drafts (+5/-8/💬34) 5 issues created: - ShortHeaderPacket does not indicate the ConnectionId length (by Vect0rZ) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4422 - Recovery section 4.2 possbile references (by LPardue) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4418 [-recovery] [ietf-lc] - Recovery section 1 possbile references (by LPardue) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4417 [-recovery] [ietf-lc] - PADDING frames consume congestion window (by kixelated) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4415 - Persistent congestion should be based on ack-eliciting packets, not in-flight (by ianswett) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4413 [-recovery] 17 issues received 34 new comments: - #4422 ShortHeaderPacket does not indicate the ConnectionId length (2 by Vect0rZ, larseggert) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4422 [-transport] [ietf-lc] - #4415 PADDING frames consume congestion window (8 by LPardue, janaiyengar, kixelated, mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4415 [-transport] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] - #4413 Persistent congestion should be based on ack-eliciting packets, not in-flight (2 by kjsisco, msvoelker) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4413 [-recovery] [ietf-lc] - #4410 tls: EndOfEarlyData in Initial/Handshake/1-RTT (2 by kazuho, kjsisco) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4410 [-tls] [ietf-lc] - #4405 Header protection mask for server Initial packet example from -tls A.3 seems incorrect (1 by larseggert) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4405 [-tls] [ietf-lc] - #4401 secdir review of -qpack; issue 3 (1 by afrind) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4401 [-qpack] [ietf-lc] - #4399 secdir review of -qpack; issue 1 (2 by afrind, larseggert) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4399 [-qpack] [ietf-lc] - #4393 Idempotency and replay (5 by MikeBishop, janaiyengar, kazuho, nibanks) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4393 [-tls] [design] [ietf-lc] - #4387 Reserve fewer codepoints for greasing (1 by larseggert) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4387 [-http] [-transport] [ietf-lc] - #4379 IANA review of -transport; question 4 (1 by larseggert) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4379 [-transport] [ietf-lc] - #4378 IANA review of -transport; question 3 (1 by larseggert) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4378 [-transport] [ietf-lc] - #4377 IANA review of -transport; question 2 (2 by larseggert) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4377 [-transport] [ietf-lc] - #4376 IANA review of -transport; question 1 (1 by larseggert) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4376 [-transport] [ietf-lc] - #4374 IANA review of -http; question 4 (1 by larseggert) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4374 [-http] [ietf-lc] - #4373 IANA review of -http; question 3 (1 by larseggert) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4373 [-http] [ietf-lc] - #4372 IANA review of -http; question 2 (1 by larseggert) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4372 [-http] [ietf-lc] - #4370 IANA review of -qpack (2 by afrind, larseggert) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4370 [-qpack] [ietf-lc] 8 issues closed: - IANA review of -transport; question 2 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4377 [-transport] [ietf-lc] - IANA review of -http; question 4 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4374 [-http] [ietf-lc] - IANA review of -http; question 3 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4373 [-http] [ietf-lc] - IANA review of -http; question 2 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4372 [-http] [ietf-lc] - IANA review of -qpack https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4370 [-qpack] [ietf-lc] - ShortHeaderPacket does not indicate the ConnectionId length https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4422 [-transport] [ietf-lc] - PADDING frames consume congestion window https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4415 [-transport] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] - secdir review of -qpack; issue 3 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4401 [-qpack] [ietf-lc] * quicwg/ops-drafts (+0/-0/💬3) 3 issues received 3 new comments: - #138 Critical streams aren't worth a whole paragraph (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/138 - #137 You can't close stream ingress (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/137 - #136 2^62-1 is a harder limit than implied (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/136 Pull requests ------------- * quicwg/base-drafts (+6/-1/💬8) 6 pull requests submitted: - [qpack] minor edits (by afrind) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4424 - [qpack] Clarify applicability of dynamic table state probing (by afrind) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4423 - recovery: persistent congestion and ack-eliciting (by msvoelker) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4421 - Minor editorial: Not necessarily ack-eliciting (by janaiyengar) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4420 - Move authority discussion earlier (by MikeBishop) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4419 - [qpack] Update security considerations TOC (by afrind) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4416 2 pull requests received 8 new comments: - #4420 Minor editorial: Not necessarily ack-eliciting (3 by janaiyengar, mirjak, msvoelker) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4420 - #4412 handling of KeyUpdate in other epochs are specified in RFC 8446, do not override (5 by kazu-yamamoto, kazuho, marten-seemann) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4412 1 pull requests merged: - transport: new_token: reviving a missing line. https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4411 Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts * https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts * https://github.com/quicwg/datagram * https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers * https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation
- Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot