Re: [radext] RFC 6158 Reviews: how does it work in practice?

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Tue, 10 January 2012 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A33E21F86AD for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:52:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.214
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.214 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.385, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gqEEWzuszuO4 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:52:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from liberty.deployingradius.com (liberty.deployingradius.com [88.191.76.128]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AEC521F8692 for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:52:13 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F0C96D1.4090609@deployingradius.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:51:45 +0100
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
References: <BLU152-W6235FB1671EB3578461C7893990@phx.gbl> <BLU152-W620A82A68D4AC6C485B60E93990@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU152-W620A82A68D4AC6C485B60E93990@phx.gbl>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: radext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [radext] RFC 6158 Reviews: how does it work in practice?
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:52:14 -0000

Bernard Aboba wrote:
> [BA]  How do we ensure that these reviews are actually carried out?

  cron?

$ rsync -avz --delete ftp.rfc-editor.org::internet-drafts .

$ perl -ne 'next if !/^draft-ietf-/;next if /^draft-ietf-radext/;next if
/^draft-ietf-dime/;chop;split;next if ($_[2] eq "RFC");next if ($_[2] eq
"Expired");next if ! -f "$_[0].txt";print $_[0],".txt\n";' < all_id.txt
> radius.txt

$ for x in `cat radius.txt`; do \
	    egrep -l RADIUS $x >> radext-review.txt; \
  done

  That gives us a list (below).  We could post the list once a month to
radext and aaa-doctors.  That would at least ensure the documents get
noted in IESG review, or IETF last call.

draft-ietf-emu-eaptunnel-req-09.txt
draft-ietf-mip4-generic-notification-message-16.txt
draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrapping-integrated-dhc-06.txt
draft-ietf-mip6-hiopt-17.txt
draft-ietf-netconf-access-control-07.txt
draft-ietf-netext-radius-pmip6-06.txt
draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-radius-ext-07.txt
draft-ietf-abfab-aaa-saml-02.txt
draft-ietf-abfab-arch-00.txt
draft-ietf-abfab-gss-eap-04.txt
draft-ietf-abfab-gss-eap-naming-01.txt
draft-ietf-emu-chbind-12.txt
draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method-01.txt
draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements-04.txt
draft-ietf-hokey-rfc5296bis-06.txt
draft-ietf-karp-ops-model-01.txt
draft-ietf-nea-pt-tls-01.txt
draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds-03.txt
draft-ietf-precis-framework-01.txt
draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-04.txt
draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-deployment-01.txt
draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-cons-04.txt

  Alan DeKok.