Re: [radext] Agenda IETF99
Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Thu, 13 July 2017 13:39 UTC
Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 233081318C4 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YM1VsJrIKsRb for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E1C131699 for <radext@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.20.184] (CPEf4cc552207f0-CM00fc8dce0fa0.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.230.129.191]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F76B506; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 13:39:38 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <83a0de2d-dd6a-f4e1-2491-35de7825615f@restena.lu>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 09:39:37 -0400
Cc: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <94CAEC76-C88D-43D0-9608-545D42E4A47A@deployingradius.com>
References: <83a0de2d-dd6a-f4e1-2491-35de7825615f@restena.lu>
To: Winter Stefan <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/-NjdZD1GB0AGX94L61pnJT0FNds>
Subject: Re: [radext] Agenda IETF99
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 13:39:41 -0000
On Jul 13, 2017, at 9:28 AM, Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu> wrote: > Obviously, if you have something to say, don't be shy: there's still > plenty of time to allocate. Let the chairs know. - proxy considerations. No new developments here, just "are people still interested?" - ID extension. Probably my draft && draft-chen-.... Personally, I'd like to see a discussion around the topic of ID extension. It's been needed for ages. Vendors have implemented proprietary extensions. Independent of the technical proposal, my draft contains a huge amount of discussion of the costs / benefits / side effects of this kind of solution. It would help if people read it and commented. Alan DeKok.
- [radext] Agenda IETF99 Stefan Winter
- Re: [radext] Agenda IETF99 Alan DeKok
- Re: [radext] Agenda IETF99 Stefan Winter
- Re: [radext] Agenda IETF99 Enke Chen