Re: Pre-work item review

[Jari Arkko <[e-mail]>]

I think the 802 document is a necessary thing. Of course, there
may be technical issues within the document, to be worked out
in this group.

The MIBs... I don't care much about the MIBs personally but they appear
to fall in our area as "mandatory maintenance".

--Jari


Nelson, David wrote:

>As a reminder to the RADEXT WG members, please respond either
>affirmatively or negatively with respect to each of these documents.
>Should the draft(s) become a RADEXT WG Work Item?  {Yes | No}
>
>You may comment on the four IPv6 MIB update documents as one, because
>they have highly similar content.
>
>Silence is not generally accepted as WG consensus, so your active reply
>is requested.
>
>  
>
>>As discussed at today's meeting, we are looking to gauge WG interest
>>    
>>
>in
>  
>
>>making the following documents WG work items:
>>
>>RADIUS MIB Revision
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nelson-rfc2618bis-00.txt
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nelson-rfc2619bis-00.txt
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nelson-rfc2620bis-00.txt
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nelson-rfc2621bis-00.txt
>>
>>RFC 3576 MIBs
>>
>>    
>>
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-decnodder-radext-dynauth-clien
>t-
>  
>
>>mib-03.txt
>>
>>    
>>
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-decnodder-radext-dynauth-serve
>r-
>  
>
>>mib-03.txt
>>
>>RADIUS Extensions for IEEE 802
>>
>>    
>>
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-congdon-radext-ieee802-03.txt
>  
>
>>Please send your comments to the RADEXT mailing list.
>>    
>>
>
>--
>to unsubscribe send a message to [e-mail] with
>the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
>archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
>
>
>  
>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to [e-mail] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>