[radext] Wiki updates
Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Tue, 02 April 2024 13:19 UTC
Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3561C14F6A7 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 06:19:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pETR10VnvPGa for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 06:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07B0CC14F685 for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 06:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (135-23-95-173.cpe.pppoe.ca [135.23.95.173]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19326209 for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 13:19:27 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deployingradius.com
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
Message-Id: <596AF3AC-AF89-44E3-AA02-CFD867406751@deployingradius.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 09:19:24 -0400
To: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/1VkKVWL205u2kHq2k8gqzoBxUgc>
Subject: [radext] Wiki updates
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 13:19:32 -0000
I've summarized too many SAAG messages to the Wiki: https://github.com/radext-wg/issues-and-fixes-2/wiki#protocol-design As best I can tell, PANA is hard, so RADIUS is being used instead to authenticate devices which already have some network access. The devices all share a common password, and seem to be using PEAP/MS-CHAPv2. It's not said what they use for a RADIUS shared secret. Presumably also a common password. It's left to the reader to determine exactly what kind of "authentication" is being performed in this design. Or what, exactly, is RADIUS being used for. Alan DeKok.
- [radext] Wiki updates Alan DeKok