Issue 149: Review of RFC 3576 MIBs

["Bernard Aboba" <[e-mail]>]

>From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[e-mail]>
>To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
>Subject: RE: REMINDER:  RADEXT WG last call on RFC 3576 MIBs
>Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 02:05:24 +0200
>
>
>Here are my comments:
>
>               draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-client-mib-02.txt
>
>1. It would help to expand RADIUS in the Abstract and to add an
>appropriate Informative Reference
>2. The first paragraph in Section 3 includes a repeated sentence
>3. As 2619bis and 2621bis will be supersets and will obsolete 2619 and
>2621, I do not believe that there is any need for the older documents to
>be referenced.
>4. No need to list in the Security Consideration section the MIB objects
>that are considered as non-vulnerable. These are by default all objects,
>but the ones listed as potentially vulnerable.
>
>
>               draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-server-mib-02.txt
>
>1. It would help to expand RADIUS in the Abstract and to add an
>appropriate Informative Reference
>2. As 2618bis and 2620bis will be supersets and will obsolete 2618 and
>2620, I do not believe that there is any need for the older documents to
>be mentioned in section 3 and referenced.
>3. No need to list in the Security Consideration section the MIB objects
>that are considered as non-vulnerable. These are by default all objects,
>but the ones listed as potentially vulnerable.
>
>The documents are in god shape. In my opinion, they may be forwarded to
>the IESG for consideration as Informational, with a note including the
>known editorial problems.
>
>Regards,
>
>Dan
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [e-mail]
> > [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> > Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 6:33 PM
> > To: Mreview (E-mail)
> > Subject: FW: REMINDER: RADEXT WG last call on RFC 3576 MIBs
> >
> > Here are 2 other MIB documents in that WG to review.
> >
> > Bert
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [e-mail]
> > [mailto:[e-mail]]On Behalf Of Bernard Aboba
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 17:00
> > To: [e-mail]
> > Subject: REMINDER: RADEXT WG last call on RFC 3576 MIBs
> >
> >
> > This is a reminder of an RADEXT WG last call in progress on
> > the RFC 3576 MIBs.  These documents are being considered for
> > publication as Informational RFCs. The documents are
> > available for inspection here:
> >
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-
> > client-mib-02.txt
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-
> > server-mib-02.txt
> >
> > RADEXT WG last call will last until Monday, November 14,
> > 2005. Please send comments to the RADEXT WG mailing list
> > ([e-mail]) in the format described in the
> > RADEXT Issues list:
> >
> > http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/RADEXT/
> >
> > If you have read the documents, please respond to this WG
> > Last Call, if only to say "I have read the documents and I am
> > OK with them."
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > to unsubscribe send a message to [e-mail] with
> > the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> > archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> >
> >
>
>--
>to unsubscribe send a message to [e-mail] with
>the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
>archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>



--
to unsubscribe send a message to [e-mail] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>