review of draft-ietf-radext-digest-auth-06.txt:

<john.loughney@nokia.com> Wed, 14 December 2005 11:07 UTC

Envelope-to: radiusext-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:08:35 +0000
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: review of draft-ietf-radext-digest-auth-06.txt:
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:07:49 +0200
Message-ID: <1AA39B75171A7144A73216AED1D7478D6CEC48@esebe100.NOE.Nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: review of draft-ietf-radext-digest-auth-06.txt:
Thread-Index: AcXAPGRRNgTWmsbTTMmD7knH+dEZ8wAD540AAAAP7EAAHHPMgAKK1KRgAsROIxAFTjSfwAGCAEYgALTRYXA=
From: john.loughney@nokia.com
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: david.kessens@nokia.com, radiusext@ops.ietf.org

I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this
specification (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Summary: This document is ready for publication - however, I did notice
that in many sections text like:

        [IANA: use 102 if possible] for Digest-Response.

I am sure IANA will raise this issue, but it would be best if this was
covered in the IANA Considerations section.

thanks,
John
	

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

review of draft-ietf-radext-digest-auth-06.txt: john.loughney