[radext] Rechartering RADEXT

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Tue, 18 March 2014 04:10 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60AAD1A04E8 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 21:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JBFJwtSNx8Z0 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 21:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-x233.google.com (mail-pb0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED911A0267 for <radext@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 21:10:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id uo5so6619811pbc.24 for <radext@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 21:09:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :cc:to:mime-version; bh=UQMy239UObCq2JSqcwXyA5sVh2+wAn4Jjw9XGu/TadY=; b=IHmpoOXj2lPgS9jfHbmqxdRPHlIapIcfLZslhvStKrLT4ePjlszxhetOZQO/fzvBKH hqBbna7N5+IbRMz9P/DDFbSbEbNno1KRALywLufUpBpMjH9HuN3z1vshpd2Q3C2UsS9X lVRJI2eaKPcA7i2Hc/WgvIq7de+0DprRqWdJn2m4njcG5DC1KCcORtlu+5Fd50Tbinp9 pJk8GWY3kSjyWPkYU1NjFXlSytZ7aQLLK3cnnwPrpfPhnpnK4FlgGPV0EDv/7AR/eEWv VVUFQjES/LuE9Mu/X6e3z0v7MpYQ0TKJxkbTC/ADPDMc6vU5zcU+drDnZD9WuV1m8FjS +aNg==
X-Received: by with SMTP id cj7mr29010671pad.7.1395115794389; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 21:09:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-18-187.meeting.verilan.com ([]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id nc1sm10935241pbc.32.2014. for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Mar 2014 21:09:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:09:45 +0800
Message-Id: <52C486C6-B1FD-4310-A38E-2EBEA8CDFB6F@gmail.com>
To: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/9bhBslnv0AgHszQmSl-Umqm99cE
Cc: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, "radext-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <radext-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [radext] Rechartering RADEXT
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 04:10:04 -0000


We are about to recharter soon, since the current charter work items are nearly done.
We got the CoA Proxying as a potential charter item. So, the question is whether the
WG is OK taking in the work in and at the same time adding required words  into the
current charter.

During the London WG meeting we had a presentation of draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext
I-D. Surprisingly many people had read it and there was also interest around the ongoing
work. So, the question is whether the WG is OK taking in the work in and at the same time
adding required words  into the current charter. In general I would (personally) like
to add text into the charter allowing RADEXT take in similar work to this more easily.

Any other topics the WG feels need to be added into the charter? I'd assume at least
Alan has one or two in his sleeves ;)

- Jouni & Stefan