Re: Genart review of draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-server-mib-05 / draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-client-mib-05
stefaan.de_cnodder@alcatel.be Thu, 08 June 2006 10:17 UTC
Envelope-to: radiusext-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 10:18:10 +0000
Message-ID: <4487F924.4040505@alcatel.be>
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 12:17:08 +0200
From: stefaan.de_cnodder@alcatel.be
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Genart review of draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-server-mib-05 / draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-client-mib-05
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Hi Ron, Thanks for the review, see below for some answers Ron Bonica wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for: > draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-server-mib-05 > -and- > draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-client-mib-05 > > > For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html. > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track document, > except for the following nit: > In fact, the 2 documents are informational. > - The client MIB contains a note to the RFC editor about the reference > [DYNSERV]. However, there is no such reference. > I checked it and the client MIB is Ok, in the server MIB it seems that the RFC ed note is incorrect and [DYNSERV] should be replaced by [DYNCLNT]. The references in both of the drafts are correct, with the exception of the RFC ed note in the server MIB. > And two substantial questions: > > - Can I assume that it has passed MIB Rx Review? (It compiles clean). > Not sure what MIB Rx review is. I compliled the MIB with Smilent. > - Should this MIB *ever* be used in conjuntion with SNMPv1? I know that > you *recommend* against it. But it seems that divulging the information > in this mib to a hostile party might be pretty bad. > http://www.ops.ietf.org/mib-security.html contains preformatted text for the security section and that text was put in the draft. See the text on that webpage in the section "-- else if there are no read-write objects in your MIB module". The text in the draft is more or less a copy/paste from that webpage. Also the other Radius MIBs like draft-ietf-radext-rfc2618bis-03.txt are also following the guidelines on the mentioned webpage. regards, Stefaan > Ron > > -- to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
- RE: Genart review of draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-se… Nelson, David
- Re: Genart review of draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-se… stefaan.de_cnodder