Re: [radext] [netmod] Comment on draft-ietf-netmod-system-mgmt-05
Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Fri, 12 April 2013 14:38 UTC
Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8031B21F89DB for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.668
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.668 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.310, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2y3RBaLthbJo for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ia0-x22f.google.com (mail-ia0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1400821F884A for <radext@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ia0-f175.google.com with SMTP id e16so2419351iaa.6 for <radext@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=1A3UdyOjeOMlymiJ1xBKZ0NAdds/GaBtYStuBcc0eyw=; b=MpTyrqHm/2dcqMp67zRK9mUHSQ3Yhz5M4UIf5GoaeEkxYkcoLm/WBJMbuzXZ4K1APe 3aM5rS6yNkrZ00VRxSrlyi5jJDot4OLdyzsbC0YFRz22eQR+GwRScUHUenFMMw0YMLYx zdQtSkkxElskf8G1TI7rkJYqV0O8siT+f1/2qTywzf5d1qISIKt3YBe5lmOWECRrCq4T Ia1j/vJFRky7M4ggrD5k3g/gRAprPGl5yh7BTyiE391C/38mfwGV4nCIiC+h9/wVf2hW eD+l/anZ9WKhUWqE4WgJ0AxZnU/RIJUi2IJARLRfmNjblBMkhZHcsdpcJi3KLIer2h8y L7Ug==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.236.100 with SMTP id ut4mr1821257igc.86.1365777513588; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.125.202 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130409.212512.301591899.mbj@tail-f.com>
References: <97FEA158-451F-4F48-85B3-5763A6026A8F@gmail.com> <CABCOCHTDveoHav4sNJMJN-3DPy_AnB5UVxje68639vicaP9Wmw@mail.gmail.com> <20130409.212512.301591899.mbj@tail-f.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:38:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHRqMGX3BRLHmEfRu5f5uFYQM6FupcLRopYtaQwk=fQLAA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmGVnYwZ8/mBX5FoTEDIj6O6C5qhz6mYPfhQirZzvrF7ueG/HyMXgiSzrjtGAVC0oAqStw4
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:40:49 -0700
Cc: radext@ietf.org, jouni.nospam@gmail.com, netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [radext] [netmod] Comment on draft-ietf-netmod-system-mgmt-05
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:38:34 -0000
.... > container radius { > list server { > key name; > ordered-by user; > > leaf name { > type string; // arbitrary name > } > leaf address { > type inet:host; > mandatory true; > } > choice transport { > case udp { > container udp { > leaf authentication-port { ... } > leaf shared-secret { ... } > } > case tcp { if-feature radius-over-tcp; > container tcp { > leaf authentication-port { ... } > // RFC 6613 section 2.6.7 talks about config parameters > // maybe include them here? > } > } > case tls { if-feature radius-over-tls; > leaf port { ... } > // what else...? > } > } > } > ... > } > > Note that this is an extensible model; other transports can be added > or augmented into this structure. > Re: features: Doesn't the NETCONF server decide what transports it can use, not the client? So new cases need to be optional. > One option could be to restructure like this but only actually define > the udp case above, and leave the rest (tcp, tls, dtls) for future > work. > Or just define the leafs you have here and leave the rest for future work. > > /martin > > Andy
- [radext] Comment on draft-ietf-netmod-system-mgmt… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [radext] [netmod] Comment on draft-ietf-netmo… Andy Bierman
- Re: [radext] [netmod] Comment on draft-ietf-netmo… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [radext] [netmod] Comment on draft-ietf-netmo… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [radext] [netmod] Comment on draft-ietf-netmo… Andy Bierman