[radext] Multiple Extensions
"Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com> Mon, 30 December 2013 21:06 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6E91AE55C for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:06:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yJDgFHj8qo0l for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:06:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp2.pacifier.net (smtp2.pacifier.net [64.255.237.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D014D1AE29A for <radext@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:06:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Philemon (c-98-247-233-24.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [98.247.233.24]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jimsch@nwlink.com) by smtp2.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1C292C9F5; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:06:06 -0800 (PST)
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: draft-ietf-radext-dynamic-discovery@tools.ietf.org
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:04:35 -0800
Message-ID: <013701cf05a2$bf28d9c0$3d7a8d40$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0138_01CF055F.B106AB30"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac8FooY0dqMUP08TQ++BCCzCK9OX/Q==
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: radext@ietf.org
Subject: [radext] Multiple Extensions
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 21:06:14 -0000
I just noticed this when doing a fast read through. This subjectAltName MAY occur more than once in a certificate. This conflicts with section 4.2 of RFC 5280 A certificate MUST NOT include more than one instance of a particular extension. What is true is that multiple names and multiple name forms may occur in the subjectAltName extension. Jim
- [radext] Multiple Extensions Jim Schaad
- Re: [radext] Multiple Extensions Stefan Winter