IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] *[AD] Re: AUTH48 [LB]: RFC 8044 <draft-ietf-radext-datatypes-08.txt> NOW AVAILABLE

Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholomew@amsl.com> Mon, 23 January 2017 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <lbartholomew@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053091296D6; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:58:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tjbKWII6q0hs; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:58:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E568E12967E; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:58:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA33C1E565A; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:58:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w05us5jLyIsc; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:58:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.12] (c-67-188-82-176.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.188.82.176]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FDA61E5657; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:58:05 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholomew@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <46889561-7CC5-42E3-8021-8568590C4D6D@freeradius.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:58:40 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E2C2573B-E42F-423B-B57A-DCC28AEFA21C@amsl.com>
References: <20170109233022.14EE5B81304@rfc-editor.org> <CAHbuEH7A2+WyuexCVtFsk8bFGMG5nqOEDwbZY12oVgmwZtaJ5w@mail.gmail.com> <FF91E7C3-72C4-4F77-A957-ED8219B9C523@freeradius.org> <CAHbuEH7-E9VUH+ZxJdqQpr=hjhKFf0obEPLKZLwJHUZBmqF21w@mail.gmail.com> <F1A445D1-C233-41AF-9E1D-8DE50E8DF092@gmail.com> <CAHbuEH6DjWip-Sr=0hRnKz4M5HwrW0H1pY5vAZE_sQHMDWgj9Q@mail.gmail.com> <438C29BB-EB6E-4D10-A538-B0C0F9DACC68@amsl.com> <6A026C96-7C9B-4217-BEE1-E78FCB13487E@amsl.com> <967AA9E0-EC69-475E-8F61-CFF4837A3CD6@amsl.com> <3058D945-CC06-43FD-96FC-80542EA31C96@gmail.com> <70E0728C-DE5F-4ED2-BAD5-3FFB50D79ACA@amsl.com> <B99BD7F6-3468-4B7E-988A-5AAC7EDD8F54@amsl.com> <46889561-7CC5-42E3-8021-8568590C4D6D@freeradius.org>
To: Alan DeKok <aland@freeradius.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/IhnyosKk_b5jAzxtLf0tT2fvt-E>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:27:48 -0800
Cc: Kathleen.Moriarty@dell.com, radext-ads@ietf.org, "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>, Winter Stefan <stefan.winter@restena.lu>, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, radext-chairs@ietf.org, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [radext] *[AD] Re: AUTH48 [LB]: RFC 8044 <draft-ietf-radext-datatypes-08.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:58:43 -0000

Apologies; RFC 4072 is now in the "updates" list and is listed in the Abstract.

RFC Editor/lb

On Jan 23, 2017, at 10:51 AM, Alan DeKok <aland@freeradius.org> wrote:

>> 
>> On Jan 23, 2017, at 1:44 PM, Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholomew@amsl.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Alan and *Kathleen,
>> 
>> We are preparing this document for publication, and we found that our question regarding the listing for RFC 4072 was not addressed.
>> 
>> RFC 4072 is listed under Normative References, but it is not cited anywhere in the text.  Please let us know whether it should be cited somewhere or removed from the references list.  Note for *Kathleen:  If the choice is to remove the reference, we will need your approval, because it is listed as Normative.
> 
>  It's listed as Normative because of the "Updates" line which says that this document updates RFC 4072.
> 
>  The only other reference to RFC 4072 was to via an attribute in the table which was removed.
> 
>  I think that leaving RFC 4072 as normative is the correct decision.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email