IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] Agenda IETF99

Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu> Thu, 13 July 2017 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9805F131A70 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mUZ837YG5Zr3 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (smtprelay.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1::62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 146FE131699 for <radext@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aragorn.restena.lu (aragorn.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8::155]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B69984395C for <radext@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 15:46:40 +0200 (CEST)
To: radext@ietf.org
References: <83a0de2d-dd6a-f4e1-2491-35de7825615f@restena.lu> <94CAEC76-C88D-43D0-9608-545D42E4A47A@deployingradius.com>
From: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
Openpgp: id=AD3091F3AB24E05F4F722C03C0DE6A358A39DC66; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66
Message-ID: <11be16b9-195e-670a-5723-7d857b0b732e@restena.lu>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 15:46:40 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <94CAEC76-C88D-43D0-9608-545D42E4A47A@deployingradius.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BDxR1IghaRenADxMQPq48ur2wRvH6VQTO"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/KJ_vcXnzL-YR0vNkpCxACy3wsck>
Subject: Re: [radext] Agenda IETF99
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 13:46:44 -0000

Hi,

> - proxy considerations.  No new developments here, just "are people still interested?"

I've added a 5 min block to discuss that topic.

> - ID extension.  Probably my draft && draft-chen-....
>
>  Personally, I'd like to see a discussion around the topic of ID extension.   It's been needed for ages.  Vendors have implemented proprietary extensions.
>
>  Independent of the technical proposal, my draft contains a huge amount of discussion of the costs / benefits / side effects of this kind of solution.  It would help if people read it and commented.

I already had a 15 min block on that topic:

Individual Drafts (15 min)
--------------------------
   * Getting beyond the 256 packets-in-flight
     limit and other header changes - various
     approaches
     - draft-chen-radext-extended-header -
     - draft-dekok-radext-request-authenticator -
                                            : 15 min

Slides are appreciated; and the earlier they come, the more appreciated they are :-)

Greetings,

Stefan Winter

-- 
Stefan WINTER
Ingenieur de Recherche
Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et de la Recherche
2, avenue de l'Université
L-4365 Esch-sur-Alzette

Tel: +352 424409 1
Fax: +352 422473

PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the recipient's key is known to me

http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email