RE: Revised RADIUS MIBs I-Ds
"Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com> Wed, 20 July 2005 15:25 UTC
Envelope-to: radiusext-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 15:27:10 +0000
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Revised RADIUS MIBs I-Ds
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:25:45 -0400
Message-ID: <2A5E4540D4D5934D9A1E7E0B0FDB2D6901032444@MAANDMBX2.ets.enterasys.com>
Thread-Topic: Revised RADIUS MIBs I-Ds
Thread-Index: AcWNPjeb0T8rp0mDTTuSC6hn8Po6OwAABfHA
From: "Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com>
To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Sorry for the incomplete message. My mail client "got away from me". :-) I would like to call the attention of the RADEXT WG to four revised I-Ds: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nelson-rfc2618bis-01.txt http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nelson-rfc2619bis-01.txt http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nelson-rfc2620bis-01.txt http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nelson-rfc2621bis-01.txt The -01 versions incorporate the feedback from MIB Doctor review. These documents update their respective predecessor RFCs, deprecate the table in which the IPv4-only address objects appear and add a new table containing version neutral IP address objects. The deprecated tables MAY be used for backwards compatibility. Please review and comment upon these drafts. There will be a very short discussion of them at IETF-63. Shortly after IETF-63, if there are no major issues, I propose to submit these I-Ds as RADEXT WG documents and initiate a WG Last Call. -- to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
- RE: Revised RADIUS MIBs I-Ds Bernard Aboba
- RE: Revised RADIUS MIBs I-Ds Nelson, David
- RE: Revised RADIUS MIBs I-Ds Bernard Aboba
- RE: Revised RADIUS MIBs I-Ds Nelson, David
- Revised RADIUS MIBs I-Ds Nelson, David