IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] Call for agenda items for IETF#87 Berlin meeting

Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com> Tue, 18 June 2013 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@painless-security.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3DC21F9BAF for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:21:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6oUCd7wlqnvK for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F6321F9F47 for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409712013A; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:17:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T3JKoqM0NNHH; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:17:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-98-216-0-82.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [98.216.0.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:17:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 9D66D80046; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:21:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
To: Jouni Korhonen <jouni@gmail.com>
References: <48059112-8694-43E2-994F-14382BED4AD9@gmail.com> <4198A764-0ADB-43B1-82B1-B9B208B05BCC@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:21:32 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4198A764-0ADB-43B1-82B1-B9B208B05BCC@gmail.com> (Jouni Korhonen's message of "Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:44:19 +0300")
Message-ID: <tsly5a7a49f.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: radext@ietf.org, radext-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [radext] Call for agenda items for IETF#87 Berlin meeting
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:21:54 -0000

I think it's fairly important that we spend enough time on the radius
fragmentation issue that we can move forward and avoid continuing to
block ABFAB documents.

--Sam

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email