[radext] WGLC for draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-06

Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu> Mon, 28 April 2014 13:15 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8471A078F for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 06:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.15
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id im9orqqxB2EF for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 06:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (smtprelay.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1::62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E74A1A047C for <radext@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 06:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (localhost []) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8C910583 for <radext@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:15:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7] (unknown [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F7EB1057E for <radext@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:15:25 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <535E546C.3000903@restena.lu>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:15:24 +0200
From: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
OpenPGP: id=8A39DC66; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WDdRQRKRFbTxrJS20FGaFaHQM4tunN4TF"
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/MQmHGoa-1AucC7zs1duN8V1aa08
Subject: [radext] WGLC for draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-06
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:15:30 -0000

Hello all,

you certainly still remember our extensive discussion in London around
the "T" flag, and how to make sure that spec writers in the future will
not forget about the existence of this flag in the document.

The authors have now written extra documentation on the topic in their
new draft (section 11.1). They have also decided on a route ahead
(favouring "Updates:").

The next thing to do is to decide if these changes are good enough for
the document to move ahead.

This mail starts a two-week WGLC (deadline is 12 May 2014).

All, please give the latest rev another read; and those of you who
commented on this particularly contentious issue please verify if the
document in general and the new section 11 in particular matches your

Since the rest of the document has already gotten a good amount of
scrutiny before and appears to have WG consensus, silence in this WGLC
round is counted as being positive towards moving the document ahead for


Stefan Winter

Ingenieur de Recherche
Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et
de la Recherche
6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi
L-1359 Luxembourg

Tel: +352 424409 1
Fax: +352 422473

PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the
recipient's key is known to me