RADIUS MIB Update I-Ds

"Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com> Tue, 15 February 2005 18:49 UTC

Envelope-to: radiusext-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:49:54 +0000
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RADIUS MIB Update I-Ds
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:49:00 -0500
Message-ID: <2A5E4540D4D5934D9A1E7E0B0FDB2D69E1911C@MAANDMBX2.ets.enterasys.com>
Thread-Topic: RADIUS MIB Update I-Ds
Thread-Index: AcUTjwTCTb+yXb42TI6KySt3u2Vz/w==
From: "Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com>
To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org

I would like to call the RADEXT WG's attention to four new Internet
Drafts:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nelson-rfc2618bis-00.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nelson-rfc2619bis-00.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nelson-rfc2620bis-00.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nelson-rfc2621bis-00.txt

These drafts propose to update their respective base RFCs by adding
support for IPv6 addressing formats in the respective RADIUS MIBs.  The
preference of the WG at IETF 60 was to update the existing RFCs rather
than obsolete them.

Please take some time to review these drafts and send comments to the
list.

Thanks!



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>