Re: [radext] Call for WG Adoption for draft-dekok-radext-nai-02; The Network Access Identifier

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Sat, 22 December 2012 10:01 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E15A921F8B32 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 02:01:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5pSj2MOb7oMX for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 02:01:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ee0-f49.google.com (mail-ee0-f49.google.com [74.125.83.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D94921F8B2F for <radext@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 02:01:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ee0-f49.google.com with SMTP id c4so2779144eek.22 for <radext@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 02:01:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=IinK4O/fgqCgclJKa2S2xvbC12Yt4/26JRhjcmAlAQY=; b=NkWjxnyR8qJ36o0pV7REJ/EgSjRlN/17JiQ2B09O6j972hgOAg/yTOfDJ3cJaOqDO5 j5AgZK/8+ulI6V+fiEmhXAo7kjIdrsOFaW8UkCdF+VB6ZJji57nJnXysR0wNFDO3eUuY sHPm2UIOg5f6EKI2Gu79nPRrKoHEWAaWvIo3IKfsAQFuasn28VJk22Gv764vf8ptL2xY 9ePDED25fi9VDXphAP1pw6dXlqtWW2KewzHrz2CnrmJImkkXvAppr5A3OiiVNy6YWFwY GkN9SVR9PmYe4uVI6rDtC07ur8icfP2BgtmTqHHT0ap1Y3rvDx2oVzltRsc5qdwugSJ5 W94A==
X-Received: by 10.14.215.194 with SMTP id e42mr39488288eep.32.1356170498036; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 02:01:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:1bc8:101:f101:4c5b:41bf:145d:d7cc? ([2001:1bc8:101:f101:4c5b:41bf:145d:d7cc]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 44sm27198085eek.0.2012.12.22.02.01.32 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 22 Dec 2012 02:01:36 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50D34419.7090005@deployingradius.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 12:01:35 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <4C9E0CE0-D42E-4E2B-8772-08DCDD276064@gmail.com>
References: <0AA5F862-FC51-43E8-9099-2F3F15406164@gmail.com> <50CCB073.1090009@freeradius.org> <50D33A12.9040608@cisco.com> <50D34419.7090005@deployingradius.com>
To: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
Subject: Re: [radext] Call for WG Adoption for draft-dekok-radext-nai-02; The Network Access Identifier
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 10:01:41 -0000

Folks,

The deadline for the adoption call has completed. As there was no
opposition to adopt the document, we will take it into WG process.

@Alan: resubmit the current document as a draft-ietf-* as soon as
possible.

We will continue pursuing the one document approach (based on the
current charter). Of course WG is now free to decide anything on
the content as long as there is consensus and it fits to the 
charter.

- Jouni & Mauricio

> Folks,
>
> As discussed in Atlanta, we are ready to ask for the WG adoption
> of draft-dekok-radext-nai-02 (The  Network Access Identifier "bis")
> starting today. The plan is that once we have had the adoption call
> finished we can move the document straight into WGLC (knowing there
> are already reviews done).

> The WG adoption call ends 20th Dec. This is a quick one week call
> since we have had the document around quite long already. If you
> have concerns against the document, raise them in the mailing list.
> Silence will be counted as acceptance. Of course folks are encouraged
> to endorse the document in the mailing list.
>
> - Jouni & Mauricio


On Dec 20, 2012, at 7:00 PM, Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> wrote:

> Benoit Claise wrote:
>>>   As discusses early, the document should be split in two.
>> Have we discussed this at the last meeting? I don't recall.
> 
>  I thought we had...
> 
>> And the meeting minutes don't indicate this:
>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/85/minutes/minutes-85-radext
>> We just rechartered to include THIS document, and the next thing is that
>> we need to split it???
> 
>  I'm OK with leaving it as one document.
> 
>  Alan DeKok.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> radext mailing list
> radext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext