IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Review of draft-ietf-radext-vlan-02.txt

"Congdon, Paul T (ProCurve)" <paul.congdon@hp.com> Thu, 20 April 2006 22:58 UTC

Envelope-to: radiusext-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 22:59:27 +0000
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Review of draft-ietf-radext-vlan-02.txt
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 15:58:46 -0700
Message-ID: <85ECA15B7BB46944BFD4C73AEA55482404BCBCE7@cacexc07.americas.cpqcorp.net>
Thread-Topic: Review of draft-ietf-radext-vlan-02.txt
Thread-Index: AcZj0EqpKWp6DwdkTQaQtENT/YLvPgA/ZX9Q
From: "Congdon, Paul T (ProCurve)" <paul.congdon@hp.com>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>, dnelson@enterasys.com, radiusext@ops.ietf.org

Well, the VLAN attributes in the draft are relevant to 802.1Q and the
priority regeneration table is relevant to 802.1D. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Aboba
> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 9:42 AM
> To: dnelson@enterasys.com; radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Review of draft-ietf-radext-vlan-02.txt
> 
> >as listed in the references section, do not
> 
> I think we are only talking about IEEE 802.1Q, right?  IEEE 
> 802 and IEEE 802.1D do not deal with this issue.  If it is 
> only one or two standards, I'd prefer to refer to them explicitly.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to 
> radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in 
> a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email