Proposed Resolution to Issue
Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Thu, 03 January 2008 17:15 UTC
Return-path: <owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JATfP-00089g-5X for radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:15:39 -0500
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JATfM-0003An-W6 for radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:15:39 -0500
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org>) id 1JATXS-0009Qj-9c for radiusext-data@psg.com; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:07:26 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3
Received: from [65.54.246.160] (helo=bay0-omc2-s24.bay0.hotmail.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>) id 1JATXN-0009Pm-El for radiusext@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:07:23 +0000
Received: from BAY117-W28 ([207.46.8.63]) by bay0-omc2-s24.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:07:17 -0800
Message-ID: <BAY117-W280E913386C270751A933893530@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_72921a68-2af9-4fd8-beb7-b0b686974df4_"
X-Originating-IP: [71.222.88.226]
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org, mikem@open.com.au
Subject: Proposed Resolution to Issue
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 09:07:16 -0800
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <1DDB0D3CC4E7F14FAE946361C0A6065504C210B0@isr-jlm-mail.Kayote.com>
References: <20071107005849.GC28431@isi.edu> <20071117011304.GD9206@isi.edu> <20071121203436.GC17076@isi.edu> <1DDB0D3CC4E7F14FAE946361C0A6065504773089@isr-jlm-mail.Kayote.com> <20071126224034.GB21472@isi.edu> <1DDB0D3CC4E7F14FAE946361C0A606550477353E@isr-jlm-mail.Kayote.com> <20071210182633.GC2054@isi.edu> <1DDB0D3CC4E7F14FAE946361C0A606550483EA8B@isr-jlm-mail.Kayote.com> <BAY117-W30BE177E692EA03ABF43D393640@phx.gbl> <20071214225110.GE21923@isi.edu> <20071221231446.GB5266@isi.edu> <1DDB0D3CC4E7F14FAE946361C0A6065504C210B0@isr-jlm-mail.Kayote.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jan 2008 17:07:17.0603 (UTC) FILETIME=[182A1330:01C84E2B]
Sender: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: d890c9ddd0b0a61e8c597ad30c1c2176
FYI. Here are the proposed changes to RFC 5090 to address the problems that Mike found in Appendix A. > Subject: RE: AUTH48 [SG]: RFC 5090 <draft-ietf-radext-rfc4590bis-02.txt> NOW AVAILABLE> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 17:07:13 +0200> From: Baruch.Sterman@Kayote.com> To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org; beckw@t-systems.com> CC: david.schwartz@xconnect.net; dscreat@dscreat.com; dwilli@cisco.com; dromasca@avaya.com; rbonica@juniper.net; d.b.nelson@comcast.net; bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> > Here are corrections to the examples as per David's input. I hope this> will put all of the outstanding issues to rest so that we can all sign> off on the document. > > There are essentially 2 corrections. In each example, the response> should be changed in two places.> > On page 24, change:> > > A->B> > INVITE sip:97226491335@example.com SIP/2.0> Proxy-Authorization: Digest algorithm="md5",nonce="3bada1a0"> ,realm="example.com"> ,response="7679b84a560835846ec553174dbabb69"> ,uri="sip:97226491335@example.com",username="12345678"> ,qop=auth,algorithm=MD5> ,cnonce="56593a80,nc="00000001"> > From: <sip:12345678@example.com>> To: <sip:97226491335@example.com>> > > B->C> > Code = Access-Request (1)> Packet identifier = 0x7d (125)> Length = 221> Authenticator = F5E55840E324AA49D216D9DBD069807D> NAS-IP-Address = 192.0.2.38> NAS-Port = 5> User-Name = 12345678> Digest-Method = INVITE> Digest-URI = sip:97226491335@example.com> Digest-Realm = example.com> Digest-Qop = auth> Digest-Algorithm = MD5> Digest-CNonce = 56593a80> Digest-Nonce = 3bada1a0> Digest-Nonce-Count = 00000001> Digest-Response = 7679b84a560835846ec553174dbabb69> Digest-Username = 12345678> SIP-AOR = sip:12345678@example.com> Message-Authenticator = BD037498E8385878A46ECF4D5F8D2B48> > > To> > A->B> > INVITE sip:97226491335@example.com SIP/2.0> Proxy-Authorization: Digest algorithm="md5",nonce="3bada1a0"> ,realm="example.com"> ,response="756933f735fcd93f90a4bbdd5467f263"> ,uri="sip:97226491335@example.com",username="12345678"> ,qop=auth,algorithm=MD5> ,cnonce="56593a80,nc="00000001"> > From: <sip:12345678@example.com>> To: <sip:97226491335@example.com>> > > B->C> > Code = Access-Request (1)> Packet identifier = 0x7d (125)> Length = 221> Authenticator = F5E55840E324AA49D216D9DBD069807D> NAS-IP-Address = 192.0.2.38> NAS-Port = 5> User-Name = 12345678> Digest-Method = INVITE> Digest-URI = sip:97226491335@example.com> Digest-Realm = example.com> Digest-Qop = auth> Digest-Algorithm = MD5> Digest-CNonce = 56593a80> Digest-Nonce = 3bada1a0> Digest-Nonce-Count = 00000001> Digest-Response = 756933f735fcd93f90a4bbdd5467f263> Digest-Username = 12345678> SIP-AOR = sip:12345678@example.com> Message-Authenticator = BD037498E8385878A46ECF4D5F8D2B48> > > And on page 26, change> > > > A->B> > GET /index.html HTTP/1.1> Authorization: Digest algorithm=MD5,qop=auth,nonce="a3086ac8"> ,nc="00000001",cnonce="56593a78"> ,realm="example.com"> ,response="ba623217b5ec024d30c4aaef9d8494de"> ,uri="/index.html",username="12345678"> > B->C> > Code = Access-Request (1)> Packet identifier = 0x7f (127)> Length = 176> Authenticator = F5E55840E324AA49D216D9DBD069807F> NAS-IP-Address = 192.0.2.38> NAS-Port = 5> User-Name = 12345678> Digest-Method = GET> Digest-URI = /index.html> Digest-Realm = example.com> Digest-Qop = auth> Digest-Algorithm = MD5> Digest-CNonce = 56593a80> Digest-Nonce = a3086ac8> Digest-Nonce-Count = 00000001> Digest-Response = ba623217b5ec024d30c4aaef9d8494de> Digest-Username = 12345678> Message-Authenticator = C360BFCEDFFBCE893469E802013DA5AA> > > To> > > > A->B> > GET /index.html HTTP/1.1> Authorization: Digest algorithm=MD5,qop=auth,nonce="a3086ac8"> ,nc="00000001",cnonce="56593a78"> ,realm="example.com"> ,response=" a4fac45c27a30f4f244c54a2e99fa117"> ,uri="/index.html",username="12345678"> > B->C> > Code = Access-Request (1)> Packet identifier = 0x7f (127)> Length = 176> Authenticator = F5E55840E324AA49D216D9DBD069807F> NAS-IP-Address = 192.0.2.38> NAS-Port = 5> User-Name = 12345678> Digest-Method = GET> Digest-URI = /index.html> Digest-Realm = example.com> Digest-Qop = auth> Digest-Algorithm = MD5> Digest-CNonce = 56593a80> Digest-Nonce = a3086ac8> Digest-Nonce-Count = 00000001> Digest-Response = a4fac45c27a30f4f244c54a2e99fa117> Digest-Username = 12345678> Message-Authenticator = C360BFCEDFFBCE893469E802013DA5AA> > > > > Thanks to David and group.> > Baruch> >
- FW: AUTH48 [SG]: RFC 5090 <draft-ietf-radext-rfc4… Bernard Aboba
- Re: FW: AUTH48 [SG]: RFC 5090 <draft-ietf-radext-… Mike McCauley
- RE: AUTH48 [SG]: RFC 5090 <draft-ietf-radext-rfc4… Bernard Aboba
- Re: AUTH48 [SG]: RFC 5090 <draft-ietf-radext-rfc4… Mike McCauley
- Proposed Resolution to Issue Bernard Aboba