IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] Agenda - status update

Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu> Fri, 04 November 2016 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301FE12956C for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 08:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.396
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N1p8V9N0Eizy for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 08:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (smtprelay.restena.lu [158.64.1.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C640C129563 for <radext@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 08:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aragorn.restena.lu (aragorn.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8::155]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7FB740D7A for <radext@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 16:07:58 +0100 (CET)
To: radext@ietf.org
References: <b4f41ac1-462d-7a0c-7d8d-a3e34498b43e@restena.lu> <FC91BF16-6C82-4F69-8A2A-8690246D8B97@deployingradius.com> <6001183d-c023-93ab-9eae-d5876f66261c@restena.lu> <7B0A8AA1-1AF0-42E7-B3CA-2AE58F8C4F6A@deployingradius.com>
From: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
Openpgp: id=AD3091F3AB24E05F4F722C03C0DE6A358A39DC66; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66
Message-ID: <42f789f1-99d9-ee8a-409a-938f9067f892@restena.lu>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 16:07:58 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7B0A8AA1-1AF0-42E7-B3CA-2AE58F8C4F6A@deployingradius.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h8qmPMnWfVQVI6RSxa48qEtkwcL7cthsW"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/TBH6otWRVubDAS2isQJqyOzXrP4>
Subject: Re: [radext] Agenda - status update
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 15:08:07 -0000

Hi,

considering that I don't have a public key for "radext@ietf.org", or
that no such key exists, I do wonder how the mail could go out encrypted
at all.

It wasn't that secret anyway :-)

Stefan

Am 04.11.2016 um 15:59 schrieb Alan DeKok:
>> On Nov 4, 2016, at 10:57 AM, Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu> wrote:
>>
>> <Mail Attachment><encrypted.asc>
>   Perhaps un-encrypted?
>
>   Alan DeKok.
>


-- 
Stefan WINTER
Ingenieur de Recherche
Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et de la Recherche
2, avenue de l'Université
L-4365 Esch-sur-Alzette

Tel: +352 424409 1
Fax: +352 422473

PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the recipient's key is known to me

http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email