Re: [radext] #180 (radius-fragmentation): draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-06: mop-up of small comments

"radext issue tracker" <trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org> Wed, 09 July 2014 12:36 UTC

Return-Path: <trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC731A04D2 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 05:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ogwrO-Je-kou for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 05:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 436061A04C5 for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 05:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:35325 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1X4r7A-0006Ux-CO; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 05:36:48 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "radext issue tracker" <trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org, alex@um.es, aland@deployingradius.com, stefan.winter@restena.lu
X-Trac-Project: radext
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 12:36:48 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/180#comment:3
Message-ID: <080.c22ca09f0a37f1fc628783bdf03a1bbc@trac.tools.ietf.org>
References: <065.fe6830fb6d900ff63bd95d61218553db@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 180
In-Reply-To: <065.fe6830fb6d900ff63bd95d61218553db@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org, alex@um.es, aland@deployingradius.com, stefan.winter@restena.lu, radext@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To: aland@networkradius.com, alex@um.es, diego@tid.es, gabilm@um.es, pereniguez@um.es
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/TNYtu70cKo1qcwYBOfXjWa4s7i8
Cc: radext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [radext] #180 (radius-fragmentation): draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-06: mop-up of small comments
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: radext@ietf.org
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 12:36:56 -0000

#180: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-06: mop-up of small comments


Comment (by stefan.winter@restena.lu):

 Thanks for the clarifying text and ASCII-art on CoA. I think it really
 helps the document.

 Most of the comments were fixed with -07; what remains is:

 * 1. Introduction, the first "bullet" paragraph. The last sentence "...
 entirely ..." sounds strange. Did you want to express that the approach is
 not useful in this context because it "... only ..." solves server-to-NAS?

 * second bullet: What is a SAML "Sentence"? I know SAML *messages* and
 *assertions* and *attributes*, but no sentences ...

 * The sentence in 7.1 now reads: "Should they are unable to add this
 information to the packet, they may silently discard forwarding it to its
 destination, leading to DoS situations." This still sounds a bit strange.
 A simple s/are/be/ would fix this.

-- 
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
 Reporter:                           |       Owner:  draft-ietf-radext-
  stefan.winter@restena.lu           |  radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org
     Type:  defect                   |      Status:  new
 Priority:  major                    |   Milestone:
Component:  radius-fragmentation     |     Version:
 Severity:  Waiting for Shepherd     |  Resolution:
  Writeup                            |
 Keywords:                           |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <https://tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/180#comment:3>
radext <http://tools.ietf.org/radext/>