[radext] Recommending ipdir review for draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation
Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com> Mon, 04 November 2013 21:16 UTC
Return-Path: <hartmans@painless-security.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92ED21E8098 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 13:16:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kcfZcdRoVwhj for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 13:16:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4479021F9EC8 for <radext@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 13:16:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164012052B for <radext@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 16:14:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pCJb7JroNmr0 for <radext@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 16:14:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (dhcp-9c4b.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.156.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <radext@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 16:14:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 98DDE87F99; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 16:16:31 -0500 (EST)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
To: radext@ietf.org
Cc:
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 16:16:31 -0500
Message-ID: <tsl4n7rvpe8.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: [radext] Recommending ipdir review for draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 21:16:48 -0000
I think our group would be served by getting IP directorate review of the RADIUS fragmentation draft sooner rather than later. My reasoning is that they will end up reviewing it anyway because it involves fragmentation at multiple layers. They will probably have questions and it would be good to get those resolved now. I think the draft is far enough along to make that review helpful. I'm not sure how to request a review, but will look into it if people agree that's useful.