Re: [radext] #168: Remaining issues for dynamic-discovery draft

Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu> Tue, 16 July 2013 12:53 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4220021F9D8F for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 05:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.156
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.156 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.443, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CdhLHVRptEPc for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 05:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (smtprelay.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1::62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F86521F9E33 for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 05:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CDB1058A for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:53:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from aragorn.restena.lu (aragorn.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8::155]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2AE110583 for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:53:21 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <51E5423E.8030002@restena.lu>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:53:18 +0200
From: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: radext@ietf.org
References: <065.8e3b593ce94ff54b06f468a19aa3f87e@trac.tools.ietf.org> <51D579F1.20905@restena.lu>
In-Reply-To: <51D579F1.20905@restena.lu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="----enig2TCTSTLSIPNSFQRDBOTGI"
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV
Subject: Re: [radext] #168: Remaining issues for dynamic-discovery draft
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:53:57 -0000

Hi,

I'm currently assembling a slide deck (yes, I know, I'm too early ;-) )
for IETF87, and am wondering which of these issues deserve some airtime
during the Berlin meeting.

In summary, my idea of those issues is:

1) NAIRealm certificate extension
---------------------------------
get an OID for UTF8String; no opinion about intermediate wildcards
(foo.*.bar)

2) Privacy (JS)
---------------
Suggest: no text update needed.

3) subsequent lookup steps (JS)
-------------------------------
Scheduled for discussion in detail on slide deck, including input from
Brian Julin.

All, especially Jim, if you're happy about the no-text action on issue
2, please let me know.

And if anyone has strong feelings about the wildcard thing - please do
hit the Reply button.

Greetings,

Stefan Winter

-- 
Stefan WINTER
Ingenieur de Recherche
Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et
de la Recherche
6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi
L-1359 Luxembourg

Tel: +352 424409 1
Fax: +352 422473