Re: [radext] #190 (bigger-packets): Does the document require an "Updates" relationship to RFC2865?
"radext issue tracker" <trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org> Thu, 29 October 2015 11:39 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D7C1B2D76 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 04:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oWHMBl80kY_6 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 04:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EE5D1B2D73 for <radext@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 04:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:45819 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1ZrlYE-0003Sv-7R; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 04:39:26 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: radext issue tracker <trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.5
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.5, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu
X-Trac-Project: radext
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:39:26 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/190#comment:2
Message-ID: <080.d741c5a8ad994506793bc7a5f0529041@trac.tools.ietf.org>
References: <065.b540a7fe9686d3ebabdd62233b43113c@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 190
In-Reply-To: <065.b540a7fe9686d3ebabdd62233b43113c@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu, radext@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20151029113926.6EE5D1B2D73@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 04:39:26 -0700
Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/ZEeeCZRvsrFXOVVVvQnWcQ5uJiQ>
Cc: radext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [radext] #190 (bigger-packets): Does the document require an "Updates" relationship to RFC2865?
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: radext@ietf.org
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:39:27 -0000
#190: Does the document require an "Updates" relationship to RFC2865? Changes (by stefan.winter@restena.lu): * status: new => closed * resolution: => wontfix Comment: The author's preference is to hold the Updates until the document goes to standards track. No dissent on the mailing list, so let's do that. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- stefan.winter@restena.lu | bigger-packets@tools.ietf.org Type: enhancement | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Component: bigger-packets | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: wontfix Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/190#comment:2> radext <http://tools.ietf.org/radext/>
- [radext] #190 (Crypto-Agility): Does the document… radext issue tracker
- Re: [radext] #190 (bigger-packets): Does the docu… radext issue tracker
- Re: [radext] #190 (Crypto-Agility): Does the docu… Sam Hartman
- Re: [radext] #190 (bigger-packets): Does the docu… radext issue tracker