Re: [radext] Agenda slot at the IETF94
Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com> Tue, 20 October 2015 11:25 UTC
Return-Path: <hartmans@painless-security.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240A31B3310 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 04:25:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y6Y7-p39H_lt for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 04:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEFE41B330D for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 04:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9302086D; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 07:23:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kerhCb7snLlP; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 07:23:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-50-136-30-120.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [50.136.30.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 07:23:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 6FF2D8250D; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 07:25:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
To: lionel.morand@orange.com
References: <31147_1445277806_5625306E_31147_10083_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E01D47E9B@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 07:25:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <31147_1445277806_5625306E_31147_10083_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E01D47E9B@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> (lionel morand's message of "Mon, 19 Oct 2015 18:03:25 +0000")
Message-ID: <tsltwplrdcv.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/_fD3xvS2y96cVVVuD_XmJIk5qvU>
Cc: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [radext] Agenda slot at the IETF94
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:25:25 -0000
I've addressed or pushed back on the points raised on draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets. Some of the chairs raised some concerns that I pushed back on. my assumption is that these concerns were raised as individuals not as chairs. My claim is that we have not yet reached consensus to make a change. My preference would be to send the document forward. However I think we need to give folks who raised concerns a chance to request discussion. I'd prefer to see someone affirmatively request discussion before giving an agenda slot, but handling that is of course the chairs' option. --Sam
- [radext] Agenda slot at the IETF94 lionel.morand
- Re: [radext] Agenda slot at the IETF94 Sam Hartman