IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Call for Adoption as a RADEXT WG Work item: draft-dekok-radext-radius-extensions-01.txt

Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Fri, 11 February 2011 18:26 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A533A696E for <ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:26:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.394
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.394 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.205, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f1lWXxj2s+FG for <ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:26:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59423A68D4 for <radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:26:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.73 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org>) id 1Pnxg7-000893-4E for radiusext-data0@psg.com; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:25:11 +0000
Received: from blu0-omc4-s23.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.111.162]) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.73 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>) id 1Pnxg3-00088i-Cu for radiusext@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:25:07 +0000
Received: from BLU152-DS7 ([65.55.111.136]) by blu0-omc4-s23.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:25:06 -0800
X-Originating-IP: [98.203.198.61]
X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU152-ds7C21AD1F8AA976E80F1CD93EF0@phx.gbl>
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: 'Peter Deacon' <peterd@iea-software.com>, radiusext@ops.ietf.org
References: <BLU152-w320DE7B855C01BC48EB13493EA0@phx.gbl> <alpine.WNT.2.00.1102081058570.5948@SMURF>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.WNT.2.00.1102081058570.5948@SMURF>
Subject: RE: Call for Adoption as a RADEXT WG Work item: draft-dekok-radext-radius-extensions-01.txt
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:26:30 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcvKFrl5OGWB2N1/QQSGP+TipgpR3AAAmQJQ
Content-Language: en-us
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Feb 2011 18:25:06.0013 (UTC) FILETIME=[019B28D0:01CBCA19]
Sender: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <radiusext.ops.ietf.org>

So do I <individual hat on>.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Peter Deacon
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 10:05 AM
To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption as a RADEXT WG Work item:
draft-dekok-radext-radius-extensions-01.txt

On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, Bernard Aboba wrote:

> An alternate approach has therefore been proposed by Alan DeKok and Avi
Lior.

> To determine whether to adopt this alternative approach, we are now doing
a Call
> for Adoption of the document "RADIUS Extensions" as a RADEXT WG work
item.  The
> document is available for inspection here:
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-dekok-radext-radius-extensions-01.txt

> Please read the document, and respond to this Call for Adoption by 
> February 23, 2011, indicating whether you favor adoption of the "RADIUS 
> Extensions" document (implying deprecation of the 'Extended RADIUS 
> Attributes" document), or not.

I favor adoption.

~P


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email