IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [ Comments on automated key management and crypto agility

"Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net> Wed, 26 December 2007 18:03 UTC

Return-path: <owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J7abF-0002dD-C5 for radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 26 Dec 2007 13:03:25 -0500
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J7abE-0004uT-DT for radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 26 Dec 2007 13:03:24 -0500
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org>) id 1J7aYS-000Ja1-IW for radiusext-data@psg.com; Wed, 26 Dec 2007 18:00:32 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3
Received: from [76.96.62.48] (helo=QMTA05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <glenzorn@comcast.net>) id 1J7aY0-000JXu-7V for radiusext@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 26 Dec 2007 18:00:19 +0000
Received: from OMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.20]) by QMTA05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id VUxT1Y00A0SCNGk0505R00; Wed, 26 Dec 2007 18:00:02 +0000
Received: from gwzPC ([67.168.164.234]) by OMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id VW001Y00153lGY33V00000; Wed, 26 Dec 2007 18:00:02 +0000
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=HnDihN7l37cA:10 a=No5EcEP4AAAA:8 a=lHIK1t_c1lC-7DL5jYkA:9 a=UIe76RprqC-e4kpik9AA:7 a=KuLx1bp-CeaukJ0WFJvUHD3_6bMA:4 a=_3nJN2eeWHAA:10
From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@comcast.net>
To: 'Alan DeKok' <aland@nitros9.org>
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
References: <tslabo4d851.fsf@mit.edu> <BAY117-W1792E6240C29062FF9B6F2935F0@phx.gbl> <47729414.9070608@nitros9.org>
In-Reply-To: <47729414.9070608@nitros9.org>
Subject: RE: [ Comments on automated key management and crypto agility
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 09:59:23 -0800
Message-ID: <005e01c847e9$0dcbc7f0$296357d0$@net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AchH6I1hz+I309tPQD+urxR21Ysz4AAAC18g
Content-Language: en-us
Sender: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906

...

  redirects have problems in practical deployments.  Intermediate nodes
often exist for commercial reasons, both for business relationships and
for application of intermediary policies.

[gwz] 
And, unfortunately, that's just scratching the surface; how that lame scheme
got into an RFC I'll never know... 
[/gwz]

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status