[radext] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-13: (with COMMENT)

["Mirja Kuehlewind" <[e-mail]>]

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-13: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for addressing my discuss!

Here is some further feedback from the IE-Doctors:
The description of the requested Information Element is still a bit
vague, but acceptable; one must read the document in order to understand
that binding the value to and end-user is really binding to one or more
(source) addresses. The reference to section 3.2.2 (which is, IMO, not
any more explanatory than the description of the IE itself) is not
necessary.