IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] New WGLC for RADIUSv11

Nick Porter <nick@portercomputing.co.uk> Wed, 06 March 2024 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@portercomputing.co.uk>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F02C14F68C for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 06:06:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=portercomputing.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rHaEi2edYcMz for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 06:06:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.portercomputing.co.uk (mail.portercomputing.co.uk [77.68.123.10]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19D1DC14F683 for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 06:06:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=portercomputing.co.uk; s=20200711; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From: References:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=iGLWouMy3uQWNZ1NYzLSTFn2xgR3wnqCUOVxzPhmMK4=; b=yOtxHrW5RoyQ4BP2Djl6km928i s3wqFuxydsO7DRQ3S1D8dhD/x36NivxaSIHrkwgRY0JHWAy/27f3kEYBZ8kU/HSGJeMFAWsVZSePb sDqJN+5PZ9KGg4B0MwBYbKzVgZXirSlaj8CP7PKKCf8C0n3GKMSdZlb8aCEr75BVkn5FrQMTc2ZGb +DmTsZG+R7dsyTQ+EY1Et9pLII36/suE3Y43zW04f0qDN+3+JM/TbxkHngK7Iga36uRWDVB+yjgks ZOqKuKYYdv51y6h1q7SG4Fh/vek1fd/kGvZYM45ZKor9Q6SFSeHrQQ5Pd6N1fdJOMNlMz6ZnCTNOb 0mRnsPqg==;
Received: from 82-69-25-187.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk ([82.69.25.187] helo=[192.168.46.150]) by mail.portercomputing.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <nick@portercomputing.co.uk>) id 1rhruY-00FGKl-5K for radext@ietf.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2024 14:06:22 +0000
Message-ID: <ea94733c-797a-4930-9637-38e69234291d@portercomputing.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 14:06:21 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
To: radext@ietf.org
References: <A9DCF202-6963-4069-A9F1-7F79860FF405@gmail.com>
From: Nick Porter <nick@portercomputing.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <A9DCF202-6963-4069-A9F1-7F79860FF405@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------L00fQxgD8tIAoXsSPPkRQSOy"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/lh3uCx3D-akEa5wJiTUeDsV5YVg>
Subject: Re: [radext] New WGLC for RADIUSv11
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 14:06:28 -0000

I have read the new version and SUPPORT publication.

Nick

On 27/02/2024 20:31, Margaret Cullen wrote:
> There have been multiple changes to the draft-ietf-radext-radiusv11 to 
> address comments made during the original Working Group Last Call 
> (WGLC).  To make sure that the WG has consensus to publish the 
> modified document as an Experimental RFC, we will have an additional 1 
> week WGLC to review those changes.  This new WGLC will end on Friday, 
> March 8th.
>
> The latest version of the document (draft-ietf-radext-radiusv11-04) 
> can be found here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-radiusv11/
>
> Please read the new version, and respond to this message clearly 
>  indicating that you SUPPORT publication of this draft as an 
> Experimental RFC, or that you DO NOT SUPPORT publication.  If you do 
> not support publication, please list any outstanding issues that you 
> would like to see resolved before publication.
>
> Please read the new version and respond to this message, even if you 
> have already responded to a previous WGLC.
>
> Thank you,
> Margaret & Valery
> radext Chairs
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> radext mailing list
> radext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext

-- 
Nick Porter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email