Re: [radext] [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579:

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Tue, 05 April 2022 13:57 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA3A3A07FD for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 06:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dLG1b8ONBAju for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 06:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FF663A07FB for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 06:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (24-52-251-6.cable.teksavvy.com [24.52.251.6]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C9A8379; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 13:56:51 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.60.0.1.1\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABXxEz-HL5-ReMX+cBD7YR2AVViqz11S7mnvQ=v8VuA-d1S3Eg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 09:56:49 -0400
Cc: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, radext@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D451DAC3-C5FE-403D-9A47-55B7DA61DF76@deployingradius.com>
References: <fbc6e33a-fa6a-ba2c-0840-700116a6a182@rfc-editor.org> <CABXxEz8toUKm06i1yX4oUg68YkeWLS0-dCLSUqzz7FSmreN7Fw@mail.gmail.com> <09F21AA5-50A0-464F-B4CF-AF174BA93DB1@deployingradius.com> <CABXxEz-HL5-ReMX+cBD7YR2AVViqz11S7mnvQ=v8VuA-d1S3Eg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Oleg Pekar <oleg.pekar.2017@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.60.0.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/m-CkX1NbP6tHlZZ2j6rqbx--vvo>
Subject: Re: [radext] [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579:
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 13:57:03 -0000


> On Apr 4, 2022, at 4:05 AM, Oleg Pekar <oleg.pekar.2017@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I submitted errata on this https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6915

  I think that looks good.

  (Removing EMU and adding RADEXT)

> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 5:21 PM Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> wrote:
> On Mar 31, 2022, at 10:05 AM, Oleg Pekar <oleg.pekar.2017@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > It looks like RADIUS RFC 2865, Section "5. Attributes" is ambiguous when it talks about the attribute value size:
> > 
> > First it says: "The Value field is zero or more octets", then it provides 5 possible value data types none of which allows a zero length value. 
> 
>   Yeah.  :(  It's horrible.
> 
> > Section "5.26. Vendor-Specific" also says about the value of a vendor-specific attribute "The String field is one or more octets".
> > 
> > Thus the RFC allows empty values for attributes in general but prohibits for any declared types of the attributes. 
> 
>   Yes.
> 
>   RADIUS is weird and terrible.
> 
>   Alan DeKok.
>