Comments for 2486bis WGLC

<Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com> Tue, 17 August 2004 11:25 UTC

Envelope-to: radiusext-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:26:45 +0000
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Comments for 2486bis WGLC
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:25:22 +0300
Message-ID: <052E0C61B69C3741AFA5FE88ACC775A60227C16F@esebe023.ntc.nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: Comments for 2486bis WGLC
Thread-Index: AcSETOInd1sFQDx1RxygWXEc1z06/g==
From: Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com
To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org

Hi,

Some minor comments about draft-arkko-roamops-rfc2486bis-02:

- In Section 2.1, on the line

   c           =/ %x2b    ; '*'              allowed

  the '*' in the comment should be '+'

- In Section 2.1, the line

   c           =/ %x5e-7e ; '^' - '          allowed

  would probably be easier to understand if written out:

   c           =/ %x5e    ; '^'              allowed
   c           =/ %x5f    ; '_'              allowed
   c           =/ %x60-7a ; 'a'-'z'          allowed
   c           =/ %x7b    ; '{'              allowed
   c           =/ %x7c    ; '|'              allowed
   c           =/ %x7d    ; '}'              allowed
   c           =/ %x7e    ; '~'              allowed

- In Appendix A, fourth bullet: it seems there are no 
  stricter requirements on the part preceding the '!' 
  sign _unless_ it's explicitly known that this realm 
  supports this syntax. 

  So it's not a backwards-compatibility problem: something 
  like "foo!bar@example.com" continues to be a valid NAI 
  (even though "foo" is not a valid realm) unless it's 
  known that example.com uses the stricter syntax
  from section 2.7.

Best regards,
Pasi

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

Re: Comments for 2486bis WGLC Jari Arkko
Comments for 2486bis WGLC Pasi.Eronen