RE: Review of DIGEST-04 document

["Salowey, Joe" <[e-mail]>]

Issue 79 is mostly resolved by DIGEST-04.  The only thing that is not
covered is the discussion of the RADIUS proxy behavior from the list.  I
think the current text is sufficient unless someone thinks we need to
differentiate RADIUS proxy from RAIDUS server. 

Joe

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernard Aboba [mailto:[e-mail]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:39 AM
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: Review of DIGEST-04 document
> 
> A new version of the RADIUS Digest Authentication document is 
> now available for inspection:
> http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/RADEXT/draft-ietf-radext-digest-
> auth-04.txt
> 
> When it shows up on the IETF archive, it will be available here:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-digest-a
> uth-04.txt
> 
> Please check the specification over carefully.  If you have 
> submitted an issue, please post mail to the RADEXT WG mailing 
> list indicating whether your issue has been resolved.  
> 
> We are asking that RADEXT WG participants complete their 
> final review by Friday, September 9, 2005. 
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to 
> [e-mail] with the word 'unsubscribe' in 
> a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to [e-mail] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>