[radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-coa-proxy-09.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Wed, 23 January 2019 02:21 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: radext@ietf.org
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8044A130DE4; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 18:21:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: radext@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.90.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: radext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <154821006049.13333.4059324868676498057@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 18:21:00 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/ruoxiYKrj8i-mDsyTT6cWilrnqE>
Subject: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-coa-proxy-09.txt
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 02:21:01 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the RADIUS EXTensions WG of the IETF. Title : Dynamic Authorization Proxying in Remote Authorization Dial-In User Service Protocol (RADIUS) Authors : Alan DeKok Jouni Korhonen Filename : draft-ietf-radext-coa-proxy-09.txt Pages : 21 Date : 2019-01-22 Abstract: RFC 5176 defines Change of Authorization (CoA) and Disconnect Message (DM) behavior for RADIUS. That document suggests that proxying these messages is possible, but gives no guidance as to how it is done. This specification updates RFC 5176 to correct that omission for scenarios where networks use Realm-based proxying as defined in RFC 7542. This specification also updates RFC 5580 to allow the Operator-Name attribute in CoA-Request and Disconnect-Request packets. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-coa-proxy/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-radext-coa-proxy-09 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-radext-coa-proxy-09 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-radext-coa-proxy-09 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-coa-proxy-… internet-drafts