IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] Questions about draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets-03

Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu> Thu, 29 October 2015 10:33 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED671B2CE9; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 03:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SdMzN6S71nmY; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 03:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (smtprelay.restena.lu [158.64.1.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11FBB1B2CEB; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 03:33:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aragorn.restena.lu (aragorn.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8::155]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6727243AA0; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:33:13 +0100 (CET)
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>, Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
References: <55D57021.8060308@restena.lu> <183E3AC7-A5CB-43D4-ADCA-E0B7DD04B43C@deployingradius.com> <tsl7fnjlrys.fsf@mit.edu> <733DFAE3-4017-466D-8CA1-E028AC6ED4B8@deployingradius.com> <tsltwqnkb6v.fsf@mit.edu>
From: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
Openpgp: id=AD3091F3AB24E05F4F722C03C0DE6A358A39DC66; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1111
Message-ID: <5631F5E9.6060306@restena.lu>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:33:13 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <tsltwqnkb6v.fsf@mit.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GlEb2PCKDeDeWa7D2QVv3E3QTNGrl6ffW"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/yT_gALsUwol2aN93xKt4LqehmIE>
Cc: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets.authors@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [radext] Questions about draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets-03
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:33:20 -0000

Hi,

>     Alan> On Sep 21, 2015, at 11:20 AM, Sam Hartman
>     Alan> <hartmans@painless-security.com> wrote:
>     >> I don't support a stronger recommendation for explicit signaling
>     >> than is present in the draft.
>     >> 
>     >> My rationale is that explicit signaling is very heavy weight for
>     >> client-side libraries.
> 
>     Alan>   I would support a SHOULD for explicit signalling, especially
>     Alan> for proxies.  Failing that, the client SHOULD do signalling at
>     Alan> least once, and then cache the results for some time.
> 
> I think there's already a SHOULD for explicit signaling.

Reading this thread, I'm not sure if both of you agreed. Parts of Alan's
previous message hinted toward at least adding the text about making
RFC2865 home server compatibility part of the things to be evaluated in
this experiment.

So, to clarify: are you happy with the text as-is in rev -04, or are
there pending text changes? If the latter, could either of you suggest
updated text for a new rev?

Greetings,

Stefan Winter


-- 
Stefan WINTER
Ingenieur de Recherche
Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et
de la Recherche
2, avenue de l'Université
L-4365 Esch-sur-Alzette

Tel: +352 424409 1
Fax: +352 422473

PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the
recipient's key is known to me

http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email