[radext] Stephen Farrell's Yes on draft-ietf-radext-dynamic-discovery-13: (with COMMENT)

["Stephen Farrell" <[e-mail]>]

Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-radext-dynamic-discovery-13: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-dynamic-discovery/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------


I have to say radext drafts are frequently very high
quality and this is no exception. Thanks.

- 2.1.1.3 - typo: s/PKS/PSK/

- 2.2, just wondering (and not suggesting you change)
but did you consider that using san.dNSName with an
accompanying policy OID could allow you to use
current CA s/w without confusing the semantics (and
without requiring the new otherName)?

- Thanks for section 6.