IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] [IANA #935820] Protocol Action: 'RADIUS Extensions for IP Port Configuration and Reporting' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-17.txt)

kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com Mon, 12 December 2016 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 3740E129CD4; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:56:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBF01295A9 for <xfilter-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:56:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5HJc3GxbGPlp for <xfilter-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:56:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x242.google.com (mail-qt0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAFC5129CF6 for <draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:55:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x242.google.com with SMTP id l20so10314142qta.1 for <draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:55:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=7+cf+e3DzW9y8MkFU+15qv87wZtSFF2VitX00VW68ys=; b=r0Xa6GYtYs4bzP4N14yQ21Jk7Ds73jOIkzLhA/nCUIGH/FV3zggWHHJjrmUtr7OAgk 4kvfMnSxPqs8yY8qT6S5kint7u3o3LWd7eTjcJFWXjVmQ0gr9gAVmoO40u0dB8DLSrdm bB6DTYSlNB16PuwcBDhGnoQYaXBmjGgp1Ao9TZFSNleR7tGi8SAKzMczMUVibLg2D0s3 qOd1O1doxJZYhWL5EmF06SSRnv8paJyop54QQdV2w8wJUjUi5DkmZerQULG4v75hv+aY HHMU9z8ueNz6KOHvu6eQzyLinpLzsbt865kZbEdahkL9Ybm0Yq8hBuozXaXTj9CyTyaq Ddxw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=7+cf+e3DzW9y8MkFU+15qv87wZtSFF2VitX00VW68ys=; b=MfckwuMGkHHTkwt90kQD+e1cBxtFp6PYn08sD/7ESNxTXzB/+2eANefy1lxn6dwsnK /rU61JhPjvBqEcVYRhN13dfO7cyHeG2+WkulRf6Im1fX7gTMJJKR4AL0QlU+VVxDsIRz sming++D/ngD7kEi23Fc0IPpj7qdBacxTNdBpueFBiJubU3eqpyUxt7GKvak86wpRkLL CSUlqRal1HNS2EDOvGhDyGd8uJEMXQ4m+2Go5BtOSw4sBHewI9z/Ln0roeD3I8P9PsLm GEgRanoPLVZ74KE4ahOcGiRTEBQKWjhOXGxccDgZa2Yfxwlx190GlxUmmMMak+ELuJKa tanA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00y48dxOlSIXHtWNCUSDyBcHcufg0h22S/zrSm2KtKUgitlX33A1T+s+73dUuxdjQ==
X-Received: by 10.237.39.37 with SMTP id n34mr82122864qtd.128.1481558119794; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:55:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.255.15.72] (207-172-76-91.ma.subnet.cable.rcn.com. [207.172.76.91]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h47sm26806961qtc.27.2016.12.12.07.55.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:55:19 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14B100)
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.2.9-19767-1481310073-638.935820-7-0@icann.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:55:18 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3595A98B-D149-46EF-8196-A175E21B20FA@gmail.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-935820@icann.org> <147854394645.7294.9903452807987765582.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <rt-4.2.9-19767-1481310073-638.935820-7-0@icann.org>
To: drafts-approval@iana.org
Resent-From: alias-bounces@ietf.org
Resent-To: dean.cheng@huawei.com, jouni.nospam@gmail.com, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, ssenthil@cisco.com, stefan.winter@restena.lu, lionel.morand@orange.com, bclaise@cisco.com, joelja@bogus.com, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, radext@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20161212155603.3740E129CD4@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:56:03 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/zT6iOmxig7aqfH16oi9Wd-XxBug>
Cc: draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu, aland@deployingradius.com, lionel.morand@orange.com
Subject: Re: [radext] [IANA #935820] Protocol Action: 'RADIUS Extensions for IP Port Configuration and Reporting' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-17.txt)
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:56:03 -0000

Hello Amanda,

Yes, but please wait for Lionel's response as well.  This message wasn't coming to my attention until someone pinged me on it and I'm wondering if the same thing happened to Lionel's email.

Thank you,
Kathleen 

Please excuse typos, sent from handheld device 

> On Dec 9, 2016, at 2:01 PM, Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-approval@iana.org> wrote:
> 
> Kathleen and Lionel,
> 
> This is a reminder that draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-17 will remain in our queue until we receive your confirmation that the new registry being created by Section 7.3 is OK.
> 
> When the document was approved, Section 7.3 was already telling us to make these registrations, but didn't identify the registry. 
> 
> thanks,
> Amanda
> 
>> On Thu Nov 17 01:02:12 2016, amanda.baber wrote:
>> Lionel and Kathleen,
>> 
>> Can you confirm that the new registry introduced in Section 7.3 of
>> draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-17 is OK?
>> 
>> thanks,
>> Amanda
>> 
>>> On Wed Nov 16 07:50:50 2016, stefan.winter@restena.lu wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I was planning to leave this to Lionel as he is the doc shepherd.
>>> 
>>> Stefan
>>> 
>>> Zitat von Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-approval-comment@iana.org>:
>>> 
>>>> Kathleen, Lionel, Stefan,
>>>> 
>>>> Re-sending this approval request. I apologize for pinging after
>>>> only
>>>> one day.
>>>> 
>>>> thanks,
>>>> Amanda
>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue Nov 15 05:05:27 2016, amanda.baber wrote:
>>>>> Kathleen, Lionel, Stefan,
>>>>> 
>>>>> The authors of draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext have uploaded
>>>>> a
>>>>> new version that creates a registry called "RADIUS IP Port
>>>>> Configuration and Reporting TLVs" in Section 7.3.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The previous version of Section 7.3 had asked us to make the same
>>>>> registrations without identifying the registry they belonged in.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Can you confirm that this new registry is OK?
>>>>> 
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Amanda Baber
>>>>> Lead IANA Services Specialist
>>>>> PTI

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email