Re: [RADIR] meeting today?

Jason Schiller <schiller@uu.net> Tue, 29 April 2008 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <radir-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: radir-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-radir-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9D83A685D; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: radir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECD228C23B for <radir@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QqmwUba3bh8n for <radir@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ashesmtp02.verizonbusiness.com (ashesmtp02.verizonbusiness.com [198.4.8.166]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918563A6C2B for <radir@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dgismtp02.mcilink.com ([166.38.58.142]) by firewall.verizonbusiness.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-5.02 (built Oct 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0K030054TFI33N00@firewall.verizonbusiness.com> for radir@ietf.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:39:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from dgismtp02.mcilink.com ([127.0.0.1]) by dgismtp02.mcilink.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.08 (built Sep 22 2005)) with SMTP id <0K0300KBPFI3JJ@dgismtp02.mcilink.com> for radir@ietf.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:39:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from meno.corp.us.uu.net ([153.39.146.71]) by dgismtp02.mcilink.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.08 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K0300JDJFI3ZQ@dgismtp02.mcilink.com> for radir@ietf.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:39:39 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:39:38 -0400
From: Jason Schiller <schiller@uu.net>
In-reply-to: <2E2FECEBAE57CC4BAACDE67638305F1047C361CAD7@ROCH-EXCH1.corp.pvt>
X-Sender: schiller@meno.corp.us.uu.net
To: "Azinger, Marla" <marla.azinger@frontiercorp.com>
Message-id: <Pine.GSO.4.20.0804291139190.22197-100000@meno.corp.us.uu.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Cc: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, "radir@ietf.org" <radir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [RADIR] meeting today?
X-BeenThere: radir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Directorate <radir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir>, <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/radir>
List-Post: <mailto:radir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir>, <mailto:radir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: radir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: radir-bounces@ietf.org

I'm good either way.  

__Jason


==========================================================================
Jason Schiller                                               (703)886.6648
Senior Internet Network Engineer                         fax:(703)886.0512
Public IP Global Network Engineering                       schiller@uu.net
UUNET / Verizon                         jason.schiller@verizonbusiness.com

The good news about having an email address that is twice as long is that
it increases traffic on the Internet.

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Azinger, Marla wrote:

> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:13:41 -0400
> From: "Azinger, Marla" <marla.azinger@frontiercorp.com>
> To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, "radir@ietf.org" <radir@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [RADIR] meeting today?
> 
> I cant do our regular time today.  Another meeting is overriding this one.
> 
> M~
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radir-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:radir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Narten
> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 8:07 AM
> To: radir@ietf.org
> Subject: [RADIR] meeting today?
> 
> I just posted my take on Section 3, but folk may need more time to review.
> 
> I can join a call today at 2PM EDT, but am not sure if we have enough text to discuss or whether people will be ready to discuss.
> 
> If a few others signal that they support a call and can join, we can have one. Otherwise, let's wait until next week and just followup on the text via email.
> 
> Thomas
> _______________________________________________
> RADIR mailing list
> RADIR@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir
> _______________________________________________
> RADIR mailing list
> RADIR@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir
> 

_______________________________________________
RADIR mailing list
RADIR@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radir