Re: [RAI] SIPit 29 Summary
Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com> Fri, 09 March 2012 18:25 UTC
Return-Path: <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
X-Original-To: rai@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rai@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D637621F85F2 for <rai@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 10:25:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.876
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.876 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id voVLLiBwLGQ2 for <rai@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 10:25:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E0121F85B5 for <rai@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 10:25:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by dakl33 with SMTP id l33so1876480dak.31 for <rai@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 10:25:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=softarmor.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5yR3BhCk5tANotqWrq32EiDX2s4L9Fjsi/EeljP2Mwo=; b=dI+noyJhSx1pw9byM0OPOU77s2ItRXzzYr00e1xkv1H67ZTXIjSggQWB/J3eNeS24X ZlD+5AtyLakt0RgIQ2t/hbyQQzF/nM7LRB9UBjpUM7kCXJTZumH70r90E+3WuAumraKG IBRIQwb4cG5tSTn+hUryUzgsK/ClhPZqbwi10=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=5yR3BhCk5tANotqWrq32EiDX2s4L9Fjsi/EeljP2Mwo=; b=kIIUbHUKwAkHXbXpOnycACukzAQp2SEmDg51V2fUv80uyHAcJvZTJ5KoXGq3zH/E4r v/QOGLWhLSw5eozAEJjnCjhJ3mUHjk/tivphzrs2mWh8vTuBEBJlRIsgEp6Xyd/vvNpD eI8FhvTEa7qJF9QyLL9z/GVOC1GCy6KE9cXZ86nlgJDOHtlCAcikqrS6Ooe161oIzlFP EjLuIVqahmAyjwGLEsmtR3FDINyvT2tayktNb7XoHxCkBzvRlOdx93HNWE/sztlQFRwU GomnMRwpq+6uTpKr4dJmr6LA6wAQUswNrCGa1x8Qskr4vKZPLQqCxBEOsHjGD+LAPpnP E8BQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.241.201 with SMTP id wk9mr5749419pbc.136.1331317550302; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 10:25:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.9.104 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 10:25:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6A523A80-6A5B-4F52-A84A-F2F876555919@nostrum.com>
References: <6A523A80-6A5B-4F52-A84A-F2F876555919@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 12:25:50 -0600
Message-ID: <CAOHm=4sxxtPp3G1dxh-9+ibjm1Om7Sq7Jt79sC-y67z67Xe4DQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b339939ab45eb04bad385e1"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlJsdvpTP4nIcLqjEOQLdJlch8elg35lxyTt/sk/gxqI+n7GfVB+jEPyFXYCKLj0P+QYfed
Cc: rai@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [RAI] SIPit 29 Summary
X-BeenThere: rai@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Real-time Applications and Infrastructure \(RAI\)" <rai.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rai>, <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rai>
List-Post: <mailto:rai@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai>, <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 18:25:52 -0000
I'm curious about: "80% of the endpoints present supported SRTP using sdes. There were no dtls-srtp implementations at this SIPit." We worked really hard on dtls-srtp for "no implementations". Is this just a matter of timing, or did dtls-srtp reach too far ahead of the implementation curve, only to grasp nothingness? -- Dean
- [RAI] SIPit 29 Summary Robert Sparks
- Re: [RAI] SIPit 29 Summary Dean Willis