Re: [RAM] Comment on draft-farinacci-lisp-00.txt (LISP)

Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com> Wed, 18 April 2007 06:23 UTC

Return-path: <ram-bounces@iab.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1He3ZH-0002TO-Bd; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:23:03 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1He3ZF-0002TG-L2 for ram@iab.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:23:01 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1He3ZE-0003Hi-AA for ram@iab.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:23:01 -0400
Received: from sj-dkim-2.cisco.com ([171.71.179.186]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Apr 2007 23:22:59 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.14,420,1170662400"; d="scan'208"; a="370384445:sNHT43583188"
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3I6MvZw004284; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:22:57 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com [128.107.191.100]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l3I6MvZV016945; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 06:22:57 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:22:57 -0700
Received: from [192.168.0.4] ([10.21.152.102]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:22:56 -0700
In-Reply-To: <200704171400.l3HE0VJ40487@merlot.juniper.net>
References: <200704171400.l3HE0VJ40487@merlot.juniper.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <3763D592-6460-4B71-B4AD-0E20B934D036@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [RAM] Comment on draft-farinacci-lisp-00.txt (LISP)
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:22:55 -0700
To: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Apr 2007 06:22:56.0862 (UTC) FILETIME=[012A27E0:01C78182]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=521; t=1176877377; x=1177741377; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dino@cisco.com; z=From:=20Dino=20Farinacci=20<dino@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[RAM]=20Comment=20on=20draft-farinacci-lisp-00.txt=20 (LISP)=20 |Sender:=20; bh=3bDE+YnXYFt0I0xXdA8D2hcmY8npWnU8RqrxxZ0UKmY=; b=DxlPVILqE6sdv4sGOrq96RgTtGjIyudaI4nHzdI08GzfM5e2XRn9qipiBCd3bRbVjDYhz25q BG9f5xaqv+z5LOcki3c+ouqoiFLlhw08KtZdwthB0AtRKH0MNJRmD+KG;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-2; header.From=dino@cisco.com; dkim=pass (si g from cisco.com/sjdkim2002 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89
Cc: ram@iab.org
X-BeenThere: ram@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing and Addressing Mailing List <ram.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ram>
List-Post: <mailto:ram@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram>, <mailto:ram-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ram-bounces@iab.org

> If an ISP does not use LISP for TE, then according to the above
> none of the ISP's routers have to be modified, which means that such
> an ISP does not need to deploy any ITRs/ETRs. And if neither hosts nor
> local routers have to be modified, then none of the local routers
> need to be ITRs/ETRs. So, where would the ITRs/ETRs be deployed ?

There are ITR/ETRs used for the address separation. Those are  
deployed at sites. And there can be, optionally, TE-ITR/TE-ETR which  
are deployed in ISPs.

Dino

_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM@iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram