Re: [Rats] rats - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 110

[Kathleen Moriarty <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for taking care of this, I was just looking to see if I needed to and can do something Ben requested instead - much appreciated!

Could you please add SecDispatch as a chair conflict for me?

Best regards,
Kathleen 

Sent from my mobile device

> On Jan 21, 2021, at 7:49 PM, Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing) <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Can you add ADD for me please?
> On 1/21/21, 3:49 PM, "Smith, Ned" <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>    Let me know if any adjustments are needed for the requested meetings. Followed previous vF2F format.
> 
>    On 1/21/21, 3:43 PM, "IETF Meeting Session Request Tool" <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>        A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Ned Smith, a Chair of the rats working group.
> 
> 
>        ---------------------------------------------------------
>        Working Group Name: Remote ATtestation ProcedureS
>        Area Name: Security Area
>        Session Requester: Ned Smith
> 
> 
>        Number of Sessions: 2
>        Length of Session(s):  2 Hours, 1 Hour
>        Number of Attendees: 60
>        Conflicts to Avoid: 
>         Chair Conflict:  teep, sacm, saag, 
>         Technology Overlap: suit, cbor, tokbind,  tls, ace
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>        People who must be present:
>          Ned Smith
>          Kathleen Moriarty
>          Nancy Cam-Winget
>          Roman Danyliw
> 
>        Resources Requested:
> 
>        Special Requests:
>          Avoid scheduling over BOFs. Favor afternoon, evening for European Time Zone.
>        ---------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
>